120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4088953)
1. Grading of prostatic cancer: II. The prognostic significance of the presence of multiple architectural patterns.
Schroeder FH; Blom JH; Hop WC; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 6(4):403-15. PubMed ID: 4088953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grading of prostatic cancer (I): An analysis of the prognostic significance of single characteristics.
Schroeder FH; Blom JH; Hop WC; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 6(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 3969374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grading of prostatic cancer: III. Multivariate analysis of prognostic parameters.
Schroeder FH; Hop WC; Blom JH; Mostofi FK
Prostate; 1985; 7(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 4080650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histological evaluation of prostatic cancer. (II): Reproducibility of a histological grading system.
Svanholm H; Starklint H; Barlebo H; Olsen S
APMIS; 1990 Mar; 98(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 2317346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance and outcome of nuclear anaplasia and mitotic index in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
Kır G; Sarbay BC; Gumus E
Urol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):430.e9-430.e16. PubMed ID: 27264167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Kiehn J; Heinzel-Wach M
Cancer; 1982 Jul; 50(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 7083133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histologic Grading of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Can Be Further Optimized: Analysis of the Relative Prognostic Strength of Individual Architectural Patterns in 1275 Patients From the Canary Retrospective Cohort.
McKenney JK; Wei W; Hawley S; Auman H; Newcomb LF; Boyer HD; Fazli L; Simko J; Hurtado-Coll A; Troyer DA; Tretiakova MS; Vakar-Lopez F; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Gleave ME; Lance RS; Lin DW; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; True LD; Feng Z; Brooks JD
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Nov; 40(11):1439-1456. PubMed ID: 27635949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.
Böcking A; Sinagowitz E
Pathol Res Pract; 1980; 168(1-3):115-25. PubMed ID: 7433250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Dong F; Yang P; Wang C; Wu S; Xiao Y; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Dec; 37(12):1855-61. PubMed ID: 24145642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prognostic significance of prostatic carcinoma grading according to Helpap].
Mahlke U; Ulman A; Kunz J
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1993; 77():82-5. PubMed ID: 7511308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nuclear shape and prognosis following orchiectomy in stage D2 prostate cancer.
Miller J; Horsfall DJ; Skinner JM; Rao DM; Leong AS; Marshall VR
Prostate; 1994 Jun; 24(6):306-12. PubMed ID: 7516069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of nuclear roundness as a tool for prostatic carcinoma grading].
López A; Vilches J; Alvarez-Ossorio J; Aparicio J; Ronco A; Castiñeiras J
Actas Urol Esp; 1992 Sep; 16(8):620-6. PubMed ID: 1462810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic criteria in patients with prostate cancer: Gleason score versus volume-weighted mean nuclear volume.
Fujikawa K; Sasaki M; Arai Y; Yamabe H; Ogawa O; Yoshida O
Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Apr; 3(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 9815728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphometrically estimated variation in nuclear size. A useful tool in grading prostatic cancer.
Blom JH; Ten Kate FJ; Schroeder FH; van der Heul RO
Urol Res; 1990; 18(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 2187298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas defined on the basis of mitosis and necrosis: a clinicopathologic study of 58 patients.
Hiltzik D; Carlson DL; Tuttle RM; Chuai S; Ishill N; Shaha A; Shah JP; Singh B; Ghossein RA
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(6):1286-95. PubMed ID: 16470605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Not all gleason pattern 4 prostate cancers are created equal: A study of latent prostatic carcinomas in a cystoprostatectomy and autopsy series.
Siadat F; Sykes J; Zlotta AR; Aldaoud N; Egawa S; Pushkar D; Kuk C; Bristow RG; Montironi R; van der Kwast T
Prostate; 2015 Sep; 75(12):1277-84. PubMed ID: 25963383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prognostic value of cytology in terms of survival in prostatic cancer].
Valle Gerhold J; Azúa Blanco J; Gómez Aracil V; Villarroya Rodríguez S; Romeo Casabona P
Actas Urol Esp; 1996 Apr; 20(4):330-5. PubMed ID: 8801793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computerized image analysis of nuclear shape as a prognostic factor for prostatic cancer.
Diamond DA; Berry SJ; Umbricht C; Jewett HJ; Coffey DS
Prostate; 1982; 3(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 7122329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
