These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 409001)
1. [Suprapubic puncture of the bladder within the scope of bacteriological urine diagnosis in gynecological-obstetrical patients]. Canzler E; Jürgens H; Herrmann M; Matzke G; Räber G Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(13):784-95. PubMed ID: 409001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Significance of suprapubic puncture of the bladder as a diagnostic method]. Pätzold K Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1977 Nov; 32(22):611-5. PubMed ID: 341545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Suprapubic percutaneous bladder puncture in children with urinary tract infections. Methods, comparative bacteriological studies, and bacterial cell count in puncture and midstream urine]. Wiebel J; Matz K; Grüttner R; Menking M; Stahnke N; Willig RP Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Jul; 97(28):1049-55. PubMed ID: 4625473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The value of suprapubic bladder aspiration in the diagnosis of bacteriuria (author's transl)]. Kunz HH; Sieberth HG; Freiberg J; Pulverer G; Schneider FJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Oct; 100(44):2252-6, 2261-4. PubMed ID: 1183322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of suprapubic puncture of the bladder in routine diagnosis]. Tschochner HJ; Pusinelli WD; Battke H Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1977 Dec; 32(24):673-6. PubMed ID: 605633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Results of diagnostic bladder puncture]. Egert H; Breitfellner G; Holzhey P Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1971 Mar; 83(11):180-1. PubMed ID: 4997868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quantitative and qualitative bacteriological studies on urine specimens obtained by suprapubic needle aspiration and on midstream-voided samples]. Augustin R; Seybold G; Witzenhausen R; Hessler M; Niemeyer G Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1978 Jun; 108(25):943-8. PubMed ID: 351798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Qualitative assessment of midstream urine cultures in the detection of bacteriuria. Gower PR; Roberts AP Clin Nephrol; 1975 Jan; 3(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 805012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Suprapubic bladder puncture as a method for obtaining satisfactory bacteriologic urinalysis]. Mössner G; Keller P; Fiebelkorn W; Maurer H Urologe; 1970 Jan; 9(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 4907456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical study on the assessment of bladder puncture in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections]. Gläser V; Seidel R; Fickert U Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1976 Sep; 70(17):887-90. PubMed ID: 788367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of the results of the measurement of O2 consumption with a conventional bacteriologic method for urine obtained by bladder puncture]. Lindemann J; Waschulewski F; Schmehl V; Fischer M; Gernand K; Bollmann R Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Oct; 266(3-4):449-52. PubMed ID: 3326373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Simultaneous diagnostic studies of bacteriuria as related to method of urine collection]. Kraatz G; Fuchs M; Neubauer F; Linke A; Panzig B Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1978 Nov; 33(22):822-6. PubMed ID: 746672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three techniques for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in dogs with urolithiasis. Gatoria IS; Saini NS; Rai TS; Dwivedi PN J Small Anim Pract; 2006 Dec; 47(12):727-32. PubMed ID: 17201824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of urinalysis and bacterial culture of canine urine obtained by antepubic cystocentesis, catheterization, and the midstream voided methods. Comer KM; Ling GV J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1981 Nov; 179(9):891-5. PubMed ID: 7042668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Initial experiences with suprapubic bladder puncture during pregnancy and puerperium]. Bergmann HJ; Deidesheimer B; Leichsenring J Zentralbl Gynakol; 1974 Nov; 96(47):1489-96. PubMed ID: 4454797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative bacteriological examinations of bladder-puncture and middle-stream urine]. Kovac A; Tiller FW Z Urol Nephrol; 1978 Apr; 71(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 664907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [To the question of correct bacteriological conception of urogenitalinfections]. Metz H; Wanner G Arztl Forsch; 1968 Jun; 22(6):186-90. PubMed ID: 4972284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Bacteriological and clinical studies of 100 significant urocultures]. Capra E; Poncini D; Poncini L Ann Osp Maria Vittoria Torino; 1975; 18(7-12):227-47. PubMed ID: 829592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Significance of suprapubic bladder puncture in bacteriological diagnostics. I. Technic and bacterial spectrum]. Thieler H; Witzleb W; Färber I; Wachtel D Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1972 May; 84(19):313-7 contd. PubMed ID: 4558290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative quantitative bacteriologic studies of urine, obtained by bladder puncture and catheter as well as by bladder puncture and midstream collection]. Baumann U; Schmid J; Reich T Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1967 May; 97(21):672-7. PubMed ID: 4874637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]