These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4091749)
21. Pediatric cardiac care consortium. Demonstrated value of a physician-directed quality assessment system. Moller JH; Borbas C; Hagler DJ; McKay CJ; Stone FM Minn Med; 1990 Jun; 73(6):26-32. PubMed ID: 2366709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An exploration of the quality of peer review group activities within Australasia. Robertson S; Parker G; Byrne S; Wright M Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1996 Oct; 30(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 8902173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality assessment mechanism in Medicare contract with the PRO of New Jersey, Inc. Kingsley DI N J Med; 1989 Feb; 86(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 2651999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Practice activity analysis. Crombie DL; Fleming DM J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap; 1988 Dec; (41):1-47. PubMed ID: 2577935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinton's health care reform proposals. First Lady brings encouraging news to AMA annual meeting. Burke EC Minn Med; 1993 Jul; 76(7):5. PubMed ID: 8377738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. ["Our profession is in danger"]. Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 2006; 99(11):57. PubMed ID: 17147337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. General issues in quality assurance. Legge D Aust Clin Rev; 1984 Sep; (14):14-20. PubMed ID: 6517753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Congress saved peer review: who knew? Williams AG JAMA Surg; 2014 Apr; 149(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 24499780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Private review-its impact on health care and physicians. Sandrick KM QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Apr; 8(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 6806740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review: central specialist committee statement. McKean WI N Z Med J; 1983 Mar; 96(728):214-5. PubMed ID: 6572827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A physician's perspective on proper design of quality assessment criteria. Merry MD QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Oct; 8(10):3-4. PubMed ID: 6817254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Attitudes of social workers toward peer review. Chernesky RH Health Soc Work; 1981 May; 6(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 7262696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Integration of quality assurance and program evaluation activities in alcoholism treatment programs: Part I. Bartlett DP; Intagliata J QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Nov; 5(11):24-8. PubMed ID: 121391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A study of dentists perceptions of a QA project conducted in their private offices. Strauss RP; Lindahl RL; Barksdale MB QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Dec; 8(12):12-4. PubMed ID: 6818505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality and accountability in health services. Marwick J N Z Med J; 1987 Aug; 100(830):528-30. PubMed ID: 3452084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. CEPRIME (Continuing Education and Peer Review in Internal Medicine): linking quality assurance with continuing medical education. Legge DG; Richmond DE Aust Clin Rev; 1986 Dec; 6(23):183-9. PubMed ID: 3579727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Your voice in the legislature. Wroten D J Ark Med Soc; 2013 Mar; 109(10):196. PubMed ID: 23540092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer-assested clinical review in an Australian pediatric hospital. Mather BS QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Apr; 8(4):7-13. PubMed ID: 6806741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]