These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4092237)

  • 1. Penny wise but pound foolish.
    Young W
    Cent Nerv Syst Trauma; 1985; 2(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 4092237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critics of US House proposal to ax AHRQ say idea is penny-wise and pound-foolish.
    Mitka M
    JAMA; 2012 Sep; 308(9):849-50. PubMed ID: 22948680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anthrax vaccine. NIAID's nasty surprise.
    Cohen J
    Science; 2003 May; 300(5621):877. PubMed ID: 12738817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NINDS delves into drug development.
    Wickelgren I
    Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5579):180. PubMed ID: 12114605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of publicly-funded scientific research should be immediately available without cost to the public. For the proposition.
    Orton C
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3231-2. PubMed ID: 16370412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results of publicly-funded scientific research should be immediately available without cost to the public. Against the proposition.
    Marshall C
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3232-3. PubMed ID: 16370413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U.S. budget. Budgets in brief.
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1275. PubMed ID: 19264989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomedical research in the USA: at the dawn of a golden age?
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10013):1. PubMed ID: 26766330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH budget. A new kind of earmarking.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5107):483. PubMed ID: 8475380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Let's Eliminate Diseases, Not Institutes: The Case for the Fogarty International Center.
    Rosenthal PJ; Goraleski KA; Rabinovich NR; Walker PF
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2017 Sep; 97(3):629-630. PubMed ID: 28990909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National expenditures for biomedical research.
    Berliner RW; Kennedy TJ
    J Med Educ; 1970 Sep; 45(9):666-78. PubMed ID: 5454696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Senate bills back huge increases.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5300):608. PubMed ID: 9019814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Senator seeks reassurance on NIH budget.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6715):94. PubMed ID: 9923666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Washington Report. Conflicting remedies for the National Institutes of Health.
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1979 May; 300(21):1231-2. PubMed ID: 431679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH budget. Senate panel adds 16% to complete doubling.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5581):493. PubMed ID: 12142502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2001 U.S. budget. Record year for science, but can it be repeated?
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):33. PubMed ID: 11192000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AIDS: a justifiable share.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5311):345. PubMed ID: 9139353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH: in line with expectations.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6514):461. PubMed ID: 7845447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When Federal science stopped.
    Mervis J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jan; 271(5246):136-7. PubMed ID: 8539608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH funding. The price of compromise.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1995 Sep; 269(5231):1662. PubMed ID: 7569886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.