BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4093245)

  • 1. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iohexol compared with diatrizoate in pediatric urography.
    Jorulf H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():42-5. PubMed ID: 6591740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Iohexol in excretory urography. Results of drug monitoring].
    Schrott KM; Behrends B; Clauss W; Kaufmann J; Lehnert J
    Fortschr Med; 1986 Feb; 104(7):153-6. PubMed ID: 3516817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK; Morris TW; Ekholm S; Plassche W; Erickson JL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iohexol vs. diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography.
    Rankin RN; Eng FW
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S112-4. PubMed ID: 3972525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
    Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of ioxaglate in abdominal angiography].
    Kumazaki T; Sugawara K; Hosoi S; Honda K; Asahi R; Suzuki T; Kanazawa M
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1983 Mar; 28(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 6876458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography].
    Sugaya K; Nishizawa O; Noto H; Suzuki T; Shimoda N; Miyagata S; Harada T; Tsuchida S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iohexol for urography in children. A preliminary report.
    Stake G; Monn E; Sommerfeldt SC
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1982 Feb; 25(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 7073207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study.
    Egeblad M; Nielsen NT; Fries J; Laulund S
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iohexol in urography. Survey and present state.
    Ekelund L
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():25-9. PubMed ID: 6206689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative radiological studies of Uromiro and Urografin as contrast media for excretion urography.
    Adamali N; Raja R
    East Afr Med J; 1979 Nov; 56(11):593-6. PubMed ID: 520238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.