These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4094095)

  • 1. A proposal for a new TNM classification of esophageal carcinoma. Japanese Committee for Registration of Esophageal Carcinoma.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1985 Dec; 15(4):625-36. PubMed ID: 4094095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [TNM classification of carcinoma of the esophagus].
    Iizuka T; Onoda T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1997 May; 24(7):893-901. PubMed ID: 9170533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing an appropriate staging system for esophageal carcinoma.
    Kunisaki C; Akiyama H; Nomura M; Matsuda G; Otsuka Y; Ono HA; Shimada H
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):884-90. PubMed ID: 16310691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Problem of the general rules and the TNM classification].
    Isono K; Onoda S
    Gan No Rinsho; 1986 Aug; 32(10):1349-52. PubMed ID: 3783965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dukes' classification as a prognostic factor in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus undergoing combined-modality treatment.
    Dabrowski A; Skoczylas T; Ciechański A; Wallner G; Zinkiewicz K; Cwik G; Górczyński R; Borowski A
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Oct; 12(10):CR409-15. PubMed ID: 17006399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status.
    Eloubeidi MA; Desmond R; Arguedas MR; Reed CE; Wilcox CM
    Cancer; 2002 Oct; 95(7):1434-43. PubMed ID: 12237911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of clinical outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using TNM classification score and molecular biological classification.
    Takeno S; Noguchi T; Takahashi Y; Fumoto S; Shibata T; Kawahara K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1431-8. PubMed ID: 17260107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staging of esophageal carcinoma: length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors?
    Bollschweiler E; Baldus SE; Schröder W; Schneider PM; Hölscher AH
    J Surg Oncol; 2006 Oct; 94(5):355-63. PubMed ID: 16967455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma.
    Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y
    Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of new UICC classifications for carcinoma of esophagus and comparison with present Chinese classification.
    Huang GJ; Zhang DW; Zhang RG; Wang LJ; Zhang DC; Cheng GY; Meng PJ
    Proc Chin Acad Med Sci Peking Union Med Coll; 1988; 3(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 3247328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
    Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
    Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stage classifications of pancreatic cancer: comparison of the Japanese and UICC classifications and proposal for a new staging system. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer.
    Kawarada Y; Isaji S
    Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 9548664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The pattern of lymphatic metastases in superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.
    Gotohda N; Nishimura M; Yoshida J; Nagai K; Tanaka N
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(61):105-7. PubMed ID: 15783006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent.
    Mariette C; Piessen G; Briez N; Triboulet JP
    Ann Surg; 2008 Feb; 247(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 18216546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinicopathologic features of superficial esophageal cancer: results of consecutive 100 patients.
    Tachibana M; Hirahara N; Kinugasa S; Yoshimura H
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 17891442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
    Duraker N; Caynak ZC
    Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 16003773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposed new criteria for early carcinoma of the esophagus.
    Sugimachi K; Kitamura K; Matsuda H; Mori M; Kuwano H; Ide H
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Oct; 173(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 1925901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significant host- and tumor-related factors for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
    Ikeda M; Natsugoe S; Ueno S; Baba M; Aikou T
    Ann Surg; 2003 Aug; 238(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 12894012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Supplementary morphological criteria F anf G in the classification of esophageal cancer by the TNM system].
    Kolosov AE; Dovgaliuk AZ; Stoliarov VI
    Arkh Patol; 1993; 55(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 7944972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression predicts outcome and lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.
    Shih CH; Ozawa S; Ando N; Ueda M; Kitajima M
    Clin Cancer Res; 2000 Mar; 6(3):1161-8. PubMed ID: 10741747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.