These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4094458)

  • 1. Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism.
    Lande R; Arnold SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 4094458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolutionary significance of sexual selection.
    Engen S; Saether BE
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Nov; 117(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 4079450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin.
    Bolnick DI; Doebeli M
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2433-49. PubMed ID: 14686521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Models of sexual selection on a quantitative genetic trait when preference is acquired by sexual imprinting.
    Aoki K; Feldman MW; Kerr B
    Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11263743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of sexual preferences in quantitative characters.
    Karlin S; Raper J
    Theor Popul Biol; 1990 Dec; 38(3):306-30. PubMed ID: 2293401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences.
    Kirkpatrick M; Barton NH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 Feb; 94(4):1282-6. PubMed ID: 9037044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of disassortative and assortative mating preferences based on imprinting.
    Ihara Y; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Sep; 64(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12948680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior.
    Han CS; Jablonski PG; Kim B; Park FC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Nov; 10():359. PubMed ID: 21092131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference.
    Laland KN
    Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Feb; 45(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 8023313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in parasitic cuckoos: sexual selection or coevolution?
    Krüger O; Davies NB; Sorenson MD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1617):1553-60. PubMed ID: 17439849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Blows MW
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Nov; 3(11):e368. PubMed ID: 16231971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity.
    Jones AG; Avise JC
    J Hered; 2001; 92(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 11396573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects.
    Day T
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 10937247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes.
    Gonzalez-Voyer A; Fitzpatrick JL; Kolm N
    Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2015-26. PubMed ID: 18489718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual dimorphism driven by intersexual resource competition: Why is it rare, and where to look for it?
    Li XY; Kokko H
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Aug; 90(8):1831-1843. PubMed ID: 33759459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.