These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4094876)
1. Voluntary control of reversible figures. Liebert RM; Burk B Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Dec; 61(3 Pt 2):1307-10. PubMed ID: 4094876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How does a figure appear and disappear in visual perception? Holt-Hansen K Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Jun; 50(3 Pt 2):1327-44. PubMed ID: 7413403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reversible perspective figures and eye movements. Flamm LE; Bergum BO Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):1015-9. PubMed ID: 876774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in top-down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures. Strüber D; Stadler M Perception; 1999; 28(10):1185-96. PubMed ID: 10694967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age and living conditions as related to perceptions of ambiguous figures. Beer J; Beer J; Markley RP; Camp CJ Psychol Rep; 1989 Jun; 64(3 Pt 2):1027-33. PubMed ID: 2762452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of instructions on the disappearance of steadily fixated luminous figures. Belton D; Ware R J Gen Psychol; 1981 Apr; 104(2d Half):249-56. PubMed ID: 7241103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Satiation effects with reversible figures. Babich S; Standing L Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Feb; 52(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 7232083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous? Long GM; Olszweski AD Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):41-71. PubMed ID: 10696278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlations among ambiguous figures, curiosity, and spatial ability. Beer J Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 2):1188-90. PubMed ID: 2087372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facilitation effects with the order of presentation of the Necker cube and Schroeder staircase. Beer J Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 2):1265-6. PubMed ID: 2087380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction of bottom-up and top-down processes in the perception of ambiguous figures. Intaitė M; Noreika V; Šoliūnas A; Falter CM Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():24-31. PubMed ID: 23851264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures? Harris JP Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):445-57. PubMed ID: 7212126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complexity of context and orientation of figure in the corridor illusion. Fineman MB Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7290859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gaze orientation in perception of reversible figures. Ruggieri V; Fernandez MF Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Feb; 78(1):299-303. PubMed ID: 8177674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual ambiguity and stability of reversible figures. Riani M; Tuccio MT; Borsellino A; Radilová J; Radil T Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Aug; 63(1):191-205. PubMed ID: 3748731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of instructions and cognitive articulation on reducing the Müller-Lyer illusion with a repeated trial. Di Nuovo S Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Dec; 59(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 6522194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Similar processing of real- and subjective-contour Poggendorff figures by men and women. Beckett PA Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2326138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]