139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4095327)
1. [Biological markers of exposure to toxic agents].
Lauwerys R; Bernard A
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1985; 33(4-5):255-61. PubMed ID: 4095327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Basic concepts of monitoring human exposure.
Lauwerys R
IARC Sci Publ; 1984; (59):31-6. PubMed ID: 6545283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human biomonitoring: state of the art.
Angerer J; Ewers U; Wilhelm M
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 May; 210(3-4):201-28. PubMed ID: 17376741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evolution of industrial toxicology toward vanishing doses and the human genome].
Colombi A; Buratti M; Rubino FM; Giampiccolo R; Pulvirenti S; Brambilla G
Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 12768958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biological monitoring of exposure to industrial toxic substances. Present-day situation and prospects for development].
Lauwerys R; Bernard A
Scand J Work Environ Health; 1985 Jun; 11(3 Spec No):155-64. PubMed ID: 4035318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Toxicological significance of biological markers].
Manno M; Sannolo N
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2004; 26(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 15584434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing workplace chemical exposures: the role of exposure monitoring.
Harper M
J Environ Monit; 2004 May; 6(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 15152307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing isocyanate exposures in polyurethane industry sectors using biological and air monitoring methods.
Creely KS; Hughson GW; Cocker J; Jones K
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):609-21. PubMed ID: 16731584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of concentrated ambient particles on normal and hypersecretory airways in rats.
Harkema JR; Keeler G; Wagner J; Morishita M; Timm E; Hotchkiss J; Marsik F; Dvonch T; Kaminski N; Barr E
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Aug; (120):1-68; discussion 69-79. PubMed ID: 15543855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exposure assessment at the workplace: implications of biological variability.
Manini P; De Palma G; Mutti A
Toxicol Lett; 2007 Feb; 168(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 17157456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to airborne pollutants].
Imbriani M; Ghittori S; Colombi A; Buratti M
Med Lav; 1989; 80(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 2755384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinetic considerations in monitoring exposure to chemicals.
Aitio A
IARC Sci Publ; 1984; (59):127-33. PubMed ID: 6545275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active and passive ozone samplers based on a reaction with a binary reagent.
Hackney JD; Avol EL; Linn WS; Anderson KR
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1994 Feb; (63):1-18; discussion 67-82. PubMed ID: 8185874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between contaminant tissue residues and effects in aquatic organisms.
Barron MG; Hansen JA; Lipton J
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2002; 173():1-37. PubMed ID: 11776748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of the comet test in occupational medicine and industrial toxicology: considerations and prospects].
Grandi C; D'Ovidio MC; Tomao P
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2006; 28(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 16705883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chronobiology and industrial medicine: approach to the evaluation of the toxicological risk in occupational exposure to xenobiotics].
Franco G; Lorena M
G Ital Med Lav; 1987; 9(3-4):125-40. PubMed ID: 3334377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Biotransformation in occupational medicine: the role of hepatic cytochrome P-450 in the mechanism of action and the biological monitoring of occupational toxic compounds].
Manno M; Saia B
Med Lav; 1994; 85(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 8035741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of absorbed dose estimates derived from passive dosimetry measurements to those derived from biological monitoring: validation of exposure monitoring methodologies.
Ross J; Chester G; Driver J; Lunchick C; Holden L; Rosenheck L; Barnekow D
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):211-30. PubMed ID: 17593947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Future of toxicology--low-dose toxicology and risk--benefit analysis.
Rietjens IM; Alink GM
Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 19(8):977-81. PubMed ID: 16918235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
