These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4095794)

  • 1. A comparison of the AIUM/NEMA, IEC and FDA (1980) definitions of various acoustic output parameters for ultrasonic transducers.
    Livett AJ; Preston RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(6):793-802. PubMed ID: 4095794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two methods for determining ultrasonic intensity for medical transducers.
    Shombert DG; Robinson RA
    Ultrasonics; 1983 Sep; 21(5):234-6. PubMed ID: 6612895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety Assessment of an A-Scan Ultrasonic System for Ophthalmic Use.
    Petrella L; Fernandes P; Santos M; Caixinha M; Nunes S; Pinto C; Morgado M; Santos J; Perdigão F; Gomes M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2143-2150. PubMed ID: 32459382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic saturation and output regulation.
    Duck FA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 25(6):1009-18. PubMed ID: 10461731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A discussion of procedures for ultrasonic intensity and power calculations from miniature hydrophone measurements.
    Harris GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(6):803-17. PubMed ID: 3913079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterising ultrasonic physiotherapy systems by performance and safety now internationally agreed.
    Hekkenberg RT
    Ultrasonics; 1998 Feb; 36(1-5):713-20. PubMed ID: 9651602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability in effective radiating area and output power of new ultrasound transducers at 3 MHz.
    Johns LD; Straub SJ; Howard SM
    J Athl Train; 2007; 42(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 17597939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Feb; 19(2):143-8, 154-68. PubMed ID: 10680619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glass-windowed ultrasound transducers.
    Yddal T; Gilja OH; Cochran S; Postema M; Kotopoulis S
    Ultrasonics; 2016 May; 68():108-19. PubMed ID: 26938326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of current IEC activities in acoustic output standardization of medical ultrasonic equipment.
    Preston RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15 Suppl 1():101-3. PubMed ID: 2672504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.
    Wear KA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Mar; 68(3):358-375. PubMed ID: 33186102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MO-D-218-01: Overview of Methodology and Standards (QIBA, IEC, AIUM and AAPM).
    Carson P
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3869-3870. PubMed ID: 28518282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measured acoustic intensities for clinical diagnostic ultrasound transducers and correlation with thermal index.
    Retz K; Kotopoulis S; Kiserud T; Matre K; Eide GE; Sande R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):236-241. PubMed ID: 27608142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple optical method for observing medical ultrasound pulse characteristics in vitro.
    Riley WA; Barnes RW; McKinney WM
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1979 Jun; 7(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 110842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in diagnostic ultrasound acoustic output from data reported to the US Food and Drug Administration for device indications that include fetal applications.
    Cibull SL; Harris GR; Nell DM
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1921-32. PubMed ID: 24154895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic power measurement of medical ultrasonic probes using a strain gauge technique.
    Bindal VN; Singh VR; Singh G
    Ultrasonics; 1980 Jan; 18(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7350722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and acoustic characterization of limited diffraction ultrasonic devices.
    Aulet A; Núñez I; Moreno E; Eiras JA; Negreira CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2737-40. PubMed ID: 21117721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between acoustic power and acoustic radiation force on absorbing and reflecting targets for spherically focusing radiators.
    Gélat P; Shaw A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 41(3):832-44. PubMed ID: 25683223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of in situ exposure to ultrasound: a proposed standard experimental method.
    Preston RC; Shaw A; Zeqiri B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 1949345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in effective radiating area at 1 MHz affects ultrasound treatment intensity.
    Straub SJ; Johns LD; Howard SM
    Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 17940107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.