718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4096074)
1. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
Horstkotte D
Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Exercise capacity after heart valve replacement].
Horstkotte D; Niehues R; Schulte HD; Strauer BE
Z Kardiol; 1994; 83 Suppl 3():111-20. PubMed ID: 7941657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-center outcome analysis of 1,161 patients with St. Jude medical and ATS open pivot mechanical heart valves.
Bernet FH; Baykut D; Grize L; Zerkowski HR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 17484464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Late incidence and determinants of stroke after aortic and mitral valve replacement.
Ruel M; Masters RG; Rubens FD; Bédard PJ; Pipe AL; Goldstein WG; Hendry PJ; Mesana TG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jul; 78(1):77-83; discussion 83-4. PubMed ID: 15223407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The porcine bioprosthesis. A review of 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement.
Hatcher CR; Craver JM; Jones EL; Bone DK; Guyton RA
Am Surg; 1983 Jan; 49(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6600591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Aortic valve replacement: technique and outcome with artificial heart valves and allografts].
Vogt PR; Turina MI
Ther Umsch; 1998 Dec; 55(12):737-45. PubMed ID: 10025187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting performance and thromboembolism after porcine xenograft cardiac valve replacement.
Geha AS; Hammond GL; Laks H; Stansel HC; Glenn WW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Mar; 83(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 7062749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the Ross operation fulfil the objective performance criteria established for new prosthetic heart valves?
Moidl R; Simon P; Aschauer C; Chevtchik O; Kupilik N; Rödler S; Wolner E; Laufer G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 10772035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later.
Magilligan DJ; Lewis JW; Tilley B; Peterson E
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Apr; 89(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 3982058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
Iwahashi K; Ota T; Okada M; Tsukube T; Matsuda H
Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
