718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4096074)
21. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.
Gersak B; Sutlic Z
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acute postoperative block of mechanical prostheses: incidence and treatment.
Santé P; Renzulli A; Festa M; Vitale N; Mollo A; Dialetto G; De Luca L
Cardiovasc Surg; 1994 Jun; 2(3):403-6. PubMed ID: 8049985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ten year durability and performance of porcine bioprostheses.
Miller DC; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Shumway NE
Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():15-8. PubMed ID: 4096073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Combined mitral and aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease: fifteen-year follow up and long-term results.
Panda BR; Shankar R; Kuruvilla KT; Philip MA; Thankachen R; Shukla V; Korula RJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Mar; 18(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 19455892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are all bileaflet mechanical valves equal?
Halkos ME; Puskas JD
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 24(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19532099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.
Stassano P; Di Tommaso L; Monaco M; Iorio F; Pepino P; Spampinato N; Vosa C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience.
David TE; Feindel CM; Scully HE; Bos J; Rakowski H
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 1260 aortic valve prosthesis beyond ten years.
Miller DC; Oyer PE; Mitchell RS; Stinson EB; Jamieson SW; Baldwin JC; Shumway NE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Aug; 88(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 6748713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. New flexible polymeric heart valve prostheses for the mitral and aortic positions.
Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Franke A; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(5):E525-32. PubMed ID: 15799940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement.
Lund O; Bland M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Jul; 132(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16798297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-term outcomes with mechanical and tissue valves.
Khan S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 11843524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve.
Nakajima H; Aupart MR; Neville PH; Sirinelli AL; Meurisse YA; Marchand MA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term experience with the omniscience cardiac valve.
Teijeira FJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 9793854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Late results after Starr-Edwards valve replacement in children.
Schaff HV; Danielson GK; DiDonato RM; Puga FJ; Mair DD; McGoon DC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Oct; 88(4):583-9. PubMed ID: 6482490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term follow-up after mitral valve replacement in childhood: poor event-free survival in the young child.
Beierlein W; Becker V; Yates R; Tsang V; Elliott M; de Leval M; van Doorn C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):860-5. PubMed ID: 17383889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
