These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4096704)

  • 21. Genetic risk assessment of germ-line mutations. Introduction.
    Ehling UH
    Genome; 1989; 31(2):841-3. PubMed ID: 2632352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cytogenetic investigation of chemically-induced aneuploidy in mouse spermatocytes.
    Liang JC; Pacchierotti F
    Mutat Res; 1988 Oct; 201(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 3173381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Guidelines for the testing of chemical for mutagenicity. Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1981; 24():1-95. PubMed ID: 7244358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of potential mammalian genotoxins using Drosophila: the need for a change in test strategy.
    Vogel EW
    Mutagenesis; 1987 May; 2(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 3325739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Current status of aneuploidy testing in Drosophila.
    Zimmering S; Mason JM; Osgood C
    Mutat Res; 1986; 167(1-2):71-87. PubMed ID: 3079878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mutagenicity testing with Drosophila melanogaster.
    Würgler FE; Graf U
    Basic Life Sci; 1985; 34():343-72. PubMed ID: 3933476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An overview of chromosomal, micronucleus, heritable effects, dominant lethal, heritable translocation, and specific locus tests.
    Livingston GK
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 160():417-27. PubMed ID: 6382336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An introduction to a series of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency special committee reports on testing approaches for the detection of chemically induced aneuploidy.
    Dellarco VL; Mavournin KH; Waters MD
    Mutat Res; 1986; 167(1-2):3-7. PubMed ID: 3941673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of larval stages of Drosophila in screening for some naturally occurring mutagens.
    Clark AM
    Mutat Res; 1982 Feb; 92(1-2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7201073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of the Drosophila zeste somatic eye mutation test for the detection of genotoxic azo dyes and an aromatic amine.
    Edwards CN; Combes RD
    Mutat Res; 1981 Nov; 84(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 6173746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ICPEMC perspectives on the scientific basis of risk assessment in genetic toxicology.
    Bridges BA
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1986; 208():175-82. PubMed ID: 3960887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Note on the utility of the st mus302 test for chromosome loss in a blind test of an environmental compound for chromosome breakage in Drosophila.
    Zimmering S
    Mutat Res; 1982 Apr; 104(1-3):117-9. PubMed ID: 7078564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Aspergillus nidulans: systems and results of tests for chemical induction of mitotic segregation and mutation. I. Diploid and duplication assay systems. A report of the U.S. EPA Gene-Tox Program.
    Käfer E; Scott BR; Dorn GL; Stafford R
    Mutat Res; 1982 Jan; 98(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 7038472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of rapid test systems for detecting the carcinogenic and mutagenic activity of chemical compounds].
    Zakharov IA; Kasinova GV; Koval'tsova SV; Marfin SV
    Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Biol; 1984; (5):729-45. PubMed ID: 6501695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. A method for comparing and combining short-term genotoxicity test data: the basic system.
    Lohman PH; Mendelsohn ML; Moore DH; Waters MD; Brusick DJ; Ashby J; Lohman WJ
    Mutat Res; 1992 Mar; 266(1):7-25. PubMed ID: 1372964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The third UKEMS collaborative trial.
    Mutagenesis; 1990; 5 Suppl():1-88. PubMed ID: 2184314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Aneuploidy-inducing chemicals in yeast evaluated by the micronucleus test.
    Basler A
    Mutat Res; 1986 May; 174(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 3517637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of the use of in vitro tubulin polymerisation, fungal and wheat assays to detect the activity of potential chemical aneugens.
    Parry JM
    Mutat Res; 1993 May; 287(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 7683381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aneuploidy: a report of an ECETOC task force.
    Aardema MJ; Albertini S; Arni P; Henderson LM; Kirsch-Volders M; Mackay JM; Sarrif AM; Stringer DA; Taalman RD
    Mutat Res; 1998 Feb; 410(1):3-79. PubMed ID: 9587424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.