89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4098417)
1. Cellular contamination during automatic and manual staining of cytological smears.
Barr WT; Powell DE; Raffan JB
J Clin Pathol; 1970 Oct; 23(7):604-7. PubMed ID: 4098417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radioisotopes in preliminary screening of cervical cancer.
Nodine JH; Chang SC; Holmes R; Lewis G; Fletcher M
J Nucl Med; 1974 Sep; 15(9):733-8. PubMed ID: 4137155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic scanning for cervical smears.
Spriggs AI
J Clin Pathol Suppl Coll Pathol; 1969; 3():1-7. PubMed ID: 5272508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cellular contamination during automatic and manual staining of cytological smears.
Levene M
J Clin Pathol; 1971 Feb; 24(1):91. PubMed ID: 4102141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Intra-stain contamination of cervical smears of normal and cancer patients. Alternatives of solution].
Uribe L; Bierschwale M; Bravo S
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1978; 43(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 89680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contamination during the staining process of cytological cervixuterine smears].
Uribe L; Biershwale M
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1977; 42(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 77538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. False positive cervical smears: a cytometric and histological study.
Nenning H; Horn LC; Kühndel K; Bilek K
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jul; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 7577756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reevaluation for overlooked signs of cervical smears in cases of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma].
Kutsuzawa T; Yamada Y; Ishizaki Y; Sato C; Kaneko M; Moriya S; Ichinoe K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Dec; 36(12):2598-604. PubMed ID: 6520480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in mass cytological and colposcopic diagnostic studies].
Pieroni G; Cariaggi P; Ottaviano M; Marchionni M; Mincione G; Bartoloni St Omer F
Minerva Ginecol; 1975 May; 27(5):418-21. PubMed ID: 1134695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
Renshaw AA
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated screening for cervical cancer: diagnostic decision procedures.
Bartels PH; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9022719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated screening of cervical smears using immunocytochemical staining: a possible approach.
Valkova B; Laurence DJ
J Clin Pathol; 1985 Aug; 38(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 2411765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LEYTAS analysis of cytological specimens: the results of thousand cervical smears.
Goyarts-Veldstra L; van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; Meyer F; Ploem JS
Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():147-60. PubMed ID: 6578401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BioPEPR: a system for the automatic prescreening of cervical smears.
Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Raaijmakers MC; Vooys GP; Van de Walle RT
J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):635-41. PubMed ID: 86581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Jet-irrigation method for the diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Its principle and accuracy.
Gravlee LC
Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Aug; 34(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 5798259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Impulse cytophotometric measurements on atypical cell smears from vagina and cervix uteri].
Göhde W; Dittrich W; Zinser KH; Prieshof J
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 May; 32(5):382-93. PubMed ID: 4558244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of MiB-1 staining in smears with atypical glandular cells.
Boon ME; Vinkestein A; van Binsbergen-Ingelse A; van Haaften C
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Aug; 31(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15282717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ.
York GL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 108(1):114. PubMed ID: 9208986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
