These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 409922)

  • 1. High-energy-photon dose measurements using exposure-calibrated ionization chambers.
    Kutcher G; Strubler K; Suntharalingam N
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(5):414-8. PubMed ID: 409922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fraction of ionization from electrons arising in the wall of an ionization chamber.
    Lempert GD; Nath R; Schulz RJ
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 6405142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric Performance of Newly Developed Farmer-Type Ionization Chamber in Radiotherapy Practice.
    Saminathan S; Godson HF; Ponmalar R; Manickam R; Mazarello J; Fernandes R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Dec; 15(6):NP113-NP120. PubMed ID: 26682769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A theoretical study of cavity chamber correction factors for photon beam absorbed dose determination.
    McEwan AC
    Phys Med Biol; 1980 Jan; 25(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 7360791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of photon absorbed-dose measurements using the AAPM TG-21 protocol for accelerating potentials up to 26 MV.
    Hazle JD; Kirby TH; Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1234-6. PubMed ID: 1753909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of dose in the buildup region using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers.
    Gerbi BJ; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 2106611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examination of the factors Ac and Aeq for cylindrical ion chambers used in cobalt-60 beams.
    Holt JG; Fleischman RC; Perry DJ; Buffa A
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 481354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
    Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The photon calibration of a tissue-equivalent ionisation chamber for neutron dosimetry.
    Williams JR; Greening JR
    Phys Med Biol; 1980 Mar; 25(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 6770380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calorimetric determination of kQ factors for NE 2561 and NE 2571 ionization chambers in 5 cm x 5 cm and 10 cm x 10 cm radiotherapy beams of 8 MV and 16 MV photons.
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6243-59. PubMed ID: 17921583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
    Araki F; Ohno T
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122102. PubMed ID: 25471975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
    McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the p(dis) correction factor for cylindrical chambers.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):L9-16; author reply L17-9. PubMed ID: 20157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of two water-equivalent phantom materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams.
    Liu L; Prasad SC; Bassano DA
    Med Dosim; 2003; 28(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 14684192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of air cavity size in cylindrical ionization chambers on the measurements in high-energy radiotherapy photon beams--an experimental study.
    Swanpalmer J; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):4671-81. PubMed ID: 22750728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Water-energy dosage calibration and standard ion dosage calibration--a comparison in ultrahard x-ray radiation].
    Christ G; Nüsslin F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Apr; 166(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 2109878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of chemical and ionization dosimetry for high-energy x-ray and electron beams.
    Durocher JJ; Boese H; Cormack DV; Holloway AF
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 6798385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.