These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 409923)

  • 21. Wedge factor changes with depth and field size on a linear accelerator with a motorized wedge.
    Raffaele L; Settineri N; Pergolizzi S; D'Angelo A
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):304-6. PubMed ID: 7501838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A pulse-rate dependence of dose per monitor unit and its significant effect on wedged-shaped fields delivered with variable dose rate and a moving jaw.
    Faddegon BA; Garde E
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3063-5. PubMed ID: 16964884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characteristics of photon beams from Philips SL25 linear accelerators.
    Palta JR; Ayyangar K; Daftari I; Suntharalingam N
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 2106609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter to nonreference condition dosimetry in the postal dose audit system.
    Mizuno H; Fukumura A; Fukahori M; Sakata S; Yamashita W; Takase N; Yajima K; Katayose T; Abe-Sakama K; Kusano Y; Shimbo M; Kanai T
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112104. PubMed ID: 25370655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Head-scatter factors and effective x-ray source positions in a 25-MV linear accelerator.
    Tatcher M; Bjärngard B
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):685-6. PubMed ID: 1508107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beam data requirements of the Clinac 4 for three-dimensional treatment planning with wedged fields.
    Lam WC; Lam KS
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Dec; 56(672):949-56. PubMed ID: 6418261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monitor unit calculation for large wedged high-energy photon beams.
    Chen Z; Reinstein LE; Ramsay EB
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Mar; 40(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 7732074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a photon and an electron beam of a 6-MV linear accelerator.
    Sharma SC; Modur P; Basavatia R
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 3211045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dose-rate distribution in wedged beams of 9 MV X-rays from Linac Neptune 10p and of gamma-ray beams from Gammatron 80S.
    Stala T; Lobodziec W; Kośniewski W
    Strahlentherapie; 1984 Jan; 160(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 6701923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recommendations for measurement of tray and wedge factors for high energy photons.
    Sharma SC; Johnson MW
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):573-5. PubMed ID: 8058025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dosimetric aspects of physical and dynamic wedge of Clinac 2100C linear accelerator.
    Avadhani JS; Pradhan AS; Sankar A; Viswanathan PS
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1997 Oct; 173(10):524-8. PubMed ID: 9353429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scattered photons from wedges in high-energy x-ray beams.
    Zhu TC; Bjärngard BE; Vadash P
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1339-42. PubMed ID: 7476722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Photon beam skin dose analyses for different clinical setups.
    Kim S; Liu CR; Zhu TC; Palta JR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):860-6. PubMed ID: 9650173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Beam profiles in the nonwedged direction for dynamic wedges.
    Lydon JM; Rykers KL
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jul; 41(7):1217-25. PubMed ID: 8822786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of dose delivery based on a comparison of dosimetry calculations using open beam and wedged beam depth dose data.
    Ho AK; Podgorsak MB; Sibata CH; Shin KH
    Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 8703325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dosimetry characteristics of large wedges for 4- and 6-MV x rays.
    Wu A; Zwicker RD; Krasin F; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 6427569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Field size dependence of wedge factors.
    Palta JR; Daftari I; Suntharalingam N
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(4):624-6. PubMed ID: 3211058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of computerized treatment planning system accuracy in calculating wedge factors of physical wedged fields for 6 MV photon beams.
    Muhammad W; Maqbool M; Shahid M; Hussain A; Tahir S; Matiullah ; Rooh G; Ahmad T; Lee SH
    Phys Med; 2011 Jul; 27(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 20655782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effective wedge angles for 6-MV wedges.
    Zwicker RD; Shahabi S; Wu A; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):347-9. PubMed ID: 3925309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.