These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4113780)

  • 1. Formol--cupric chloride method for the examination of protozoan cysts and helmith ova.
    Bozdech V; Moronfoye IA
    West Afr Med J Niger Pract; 1972 Feb; 21(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 4113780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Examination technics for diarrheal parasitic (protozoan and helminthic) infections].
    Nakabayashi T; Ono T; Nakai T
    Rinsho Byori; 1984 Jul; 32(7):726-33. PubMed ID: 6209436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison between the PAFS fixative and the modified Telemann methods in the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa in humans].
    Torres P; Navarrete N
    Bol Chil Parasitol; 1972; 27(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 4662195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Kato thick smear technique and formol-ether sedimentation method for qualitative diagnosis of intestinal helminths.
    Pamba HO; Mulega PC
    East Afr Med J; 1981 Feb; 58(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 7249982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of Burrows, modified Teleman and Brooke and Goldman methods for the microscopic diagnosis of intestinal parasites in man (author's transl)].
    Sagua H; Subiabre V; Galdames M; Arias B
    Rev Med Chil; 1975 Mar; 103(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 1153907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Usefulness of the Kato-Miura method for routine tests in analytical laboratories].
    Piatkowska W; Puszyńska M; Narewska G
    Wiad Parazytol; 1973; 19(5):731-4. PubMed ID: 4768038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New possibilities of diagnosing intestinal helminthiasis by flotation of ova in a honey medium].
    Radulović S; Joković B
    Zb Vojnomed Akad; 1981; 23():38-41. PubMed ID: 6963840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of formol-ether, zinc sulphate and magnesium sulphate concentration techniques for diagnosis of helminthic ova and protozoal cysts.
    Vinayak VK; Tandon BN; Prakash O
    Indian J Med Res; 1967 Feb; 55(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 6045049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [On the diagnosis of protozoan diseases of the intestine].
    Turdyev AA
    Lab Delo; 1968; 11():687-9. PubMed ID: 4185393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [What do we expect from a parasitological examination of feces?].
    Datry A; Carrière J; Danis M
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1995; 19(5 Pt 2):B99-103. PubMed ID: 8522110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of duplicated series of stool-examinations for all intestinal parasites by five different methods in school-children in East Africa with remarks on serological aspects of amoebiasis and schistosomiasis.
    Rijpstra AC
    Ann Soc Belg Med Trop; 1975; 55(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 1232946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Problem of laboratory diagnosis of intestinal parasitoses, especially amebiasis, in subjects returning from tropical countries].
    Zwierz C; Myjak P; Kubrewicz L; Banach-Piatkowska W
    Ann Soc Belg Med Trop; 1975; 55(5):403-13. PubMed ID: 1232945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Search for intestinal parasites: importance of repeat stool examination. Study of 5,367 patients].
    Bourée P; Botterel F; Lançon A; Bannelier E
    Presse Med; 1998 Sep; 27(27):1382. PubMed ID: 9793054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Rectoscopy in parasitic diseases of the gastrointestinal system].
    Mastrandrea G; Mele G
    Arch Ital Sci Med Trop Parassitol; 1968; 49(1):3-42. PubMed ID: 5740691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adequately performed stool ova and parasite examinations: is the best the enemy of the good?
    Hänscheid T; Valadas E
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Jul; 43(1):117-8. PubMed ID: 16758436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the sensitivity of microscopy and culture in the laboratory diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infection.
    McMillan A; McNeillage GJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jul; 37(7):809-11. PubMed ID: 6086726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the formalin-tween concentration technique for parasitic detection.
    Methanitikorn R; Sukontason K; Sukontason KL; Piangjai S
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2003; 45(5):289-91. PubMed ID: 14743670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved detection of intestinal parasites.
    Faler K; Faler K
    Mod Vet Pract; 1984 Apr; 65(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 6738492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Importance of Kato's technic in parasitic coprology].
    Kremer M; Molet B
    Ann Soc Belg Med Trop; 1975; 55(5):427-30. PubMed ID: 1232947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative efficiency of coprologic methods used in Czechoslovakia for routine diagnosis of intestinal parasitosis].
    Palicka P; Zitek K
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 1972 May; 57(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 5028138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.