These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The possibility of chromosome classification as identified by trypsin-giemsa banding patterns. Miyake YI; Ishikawa T Zuchthygiene; 1978 Mar; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 348531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Banding patterns of chromosomes in bone marrow cells of the Chinese hamster as revealed by acetic-saline-giemsa, urea, and trypsin technics. Lavappa KS; Fu MM; Singh M; Beyer RD; Epstein SS Lab Anim Sci; 1973 Aug; 23(4):546-50. PubMed ID: 4126149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Banding pattern analysis of human chromosomes by use of a urea treatment technique. Shiraishi Y; Yosida TH Chromosoma; 1972; 37(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 4113461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of trypsin in the pre-treatment of chromosomes for Giemsa banding. Korf BR; Schuh BE; Salwen MJ; Warburton D; Miller OJ Hum Genet; 1976 Jan; 31(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 55376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Karyotype of the chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes, based on measurements and banding pattern: comparison to the human karyotype. Warburton D; Firschein IL; Miller DA; Warburton FE Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1973; 12(6):453-61. PubMed ID: 4134388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of chimpanzee and human chromosomes using the Giemsa-11 and other chromosome banding techniques. Bobrow M; Madan K Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1973; 12(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 4123123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation in trypsin banding at different stages of contraction in human chromosomes and the definition, by measurement, of the "average" karyotype. Seabright M; Cooke P; Wheeler M Humangenetik; 1975 Aug; 29(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 51821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Giemsa banding of the chromosomes of the domestic sheep (Ovis aries). Zartman DL; Bruère AN Can J Genet Cytol; 1974 Sep; 16(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 4141277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. C- and G-bands of the opossum chromosomes: terminal sequences of DNA replication. Sinha AK; Kakati S Can J Genet Cytol; 1976 Mar; 18(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 59621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA content and DNA-based centromeric index of the 24 human chromosomes. Mendelsohn ML; Mayall BH; Bogart E; Moore DH; Perry BH Science; 1973 Mar; 179(4078):1126-9. PubMed ID: 4120257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The human complement after trypsin pretreatment as compared to the Paris standard. Ray M; Canning N; Hamerton JL Humangenetik; 1975 Aug; 29(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 51820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The X chromosomes of mammals: karylogical homology as revealed by banding techniques. Pathak S; Stock AD Genetics; 1974 Oct; 78(2):703-14. PubMed ID: 4141315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observations on specific giemsa staining of the Y and on selective oil destaining of the chromosomes. Dallapiccola B; Ricci N Humangenetik; 1975; 26(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 48496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of G-, Q- and EM-banding patterns exhibited by the chromosome complement of the Indian muntjac, Muntiacus muntjak, with reference to nuclear DNA content and chromatin ultrastructure. Green RJ; Bahr GF Chromosoma; 1975; 50(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 48452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]