BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4119330)

  • 1. [Device for determination of horizontal linear sperm migration with subsequent fixation and staining possibilities].
    Porstmann T; Rohde W; Traut W
    Z Med Labortech; 1972; 13(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 4119330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [System of temporary blocking of transporting device of the universal automat of the AT-4 type for histological handling and staining of tissues].
    Shmurun RI
    Arkh Patol; 1982; 44(11):72-4. PubMed ID: 6186230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An apparatus for both automatic staining and coverslipmounting of histological slides.
    Lettinga KP; Prop FJ
    Pathol Eur; 1973; 8(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 4133174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fine structure of the hamster sperm head.
    Yanagimachi R; Noda YD
    Am J Anat; 1970 Jul; 128(3):367-88. PubMed ID: 4193817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa.
    García-Herreros M; Aparicio IM; Barón FJ; García-Marín LJ; Gil MC
    Int J Androl; 2006 Oct; 29(5):553-63. PubMed ID: 16968497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous evaluation of viability and acrosome integrity of mouse spermatozoa using light microscopy.
    Somfai T; Bodó S; Nagy S; Gócza E; Iváncsics J; Kovács A
    Biotech Histochem; 2002 May; 77(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 12229931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A triple-stain technique for evaluating normal acrosome reactions of human sperm.
    Talbot P; Chacon RS
    J Exp Zool; 1981 Feb; 215(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 6168732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of wet fixation, staining techniques, and storage time on bull sperm morphology.
    Sekoni VO; Gustafsson BK; Mather EC
    Nord Vet Med; 1981; 33(4-5):161-6. PubMed ID: 6172775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphological differentiation of human spermatozoa with Testsimplets slides.
    Schirren C; Eckhardt U; Jachczik R; Carstensen CA
    Andrologia; 1977; 9(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 70178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated sperm morphometry analysis (ASMA) in the rabbit.
    Gravance CG; Davis RO
    J Androl; 1995; 16(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 7539416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Triple staining of human sperm: technical aspects.
    Jager S; Kuiken J; Kremer J
    Arch Androl; 1984; 12 Suppl():53-8. PubMed ID: 6085545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of vanadium compounds and especially of alkaline polyvanadates for staining in electron microscopy].
    Veres I
    Mikroskopie; 1968 Feb; 22(5):147-52. PubMed ID: 4176456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three staining techniques for the morphometric study of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) spermatozoa.
    Tuset VM; Dietrich GJ; Wojtczak M; Słowińska M; de Monserrat J; Ciereszko A
    Theriogenology; 2008 May; 69(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 18359066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Detection of human sperm morphology and acrosome reaction with Coomassie brilliant blue staining].
    Lu HY; Lu JC; Hu YA; Wang YM; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2002; 8(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 12478845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three different staining methods for the assessment of epididymal red deer sperm morphometry by computerized analysis with ISAS.
    Soler C; Gadea B; Soler AJ; Fernández-Santos MR; Esteso MC; Núñez J; Moreira PN; Núñez M; Gutiérrez R; Sancho M; Garde JJ
    Theriogenology; 2005 Sep; 64(5):1236-43. PubMed ID: 15923029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer.
    Hidalgo M; Rodríguez I; Dorado J
    Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):996-1003. PubMed ID: 16620924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of three methods for evaluating acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa].
    Zhang Y; Xie QX; Pan SP; Zhang CX; Xiao LJ; Peng YL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2005 Jun; 11(6):419-21, 425. PubMed ID: 15999483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perforated BEEM capsules for precipitate-free transfer of ultrathin sections through staining solutions.
    Dougherty WJ
    Stain Technol; 1967 Mar; 42(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 4167064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drosophila melanogaster and Eucypris virens giant spermatozoa as visualized by cell inclusion in microgels.
    López-Fernández C; Baltanás A; De La Torre J; Gosálvez J
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol; 2007 Mar; 307(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 17397067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of an acrosomal stain for equine sperm that differentiates between living and dead sperm.
    Casey PJ; Hillman RB; Robertson KR; Yudin AI; Liu IK; Drobnis EZ
    J Androl; 1993; 14(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 7693637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.