These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 412865)

  • 21. [The problem of the lost intrauterine contraceptive device (author's transl)].
    Hepp H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Aug; 37(8):653-9. PubMed ID: 902960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ureteral and sigmoid obstruction caused by pelvic actinomycosis in an intrauterine contraceptive device user.
    Nasu K; Matsumoto H; Yoshimatsu J; Miyakawa I
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 54(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 12592067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Applicability of ultrasonic B-scan diagnosis to localisation of intra-uterine contraceptive devices (author's transl)].
    Zanke S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1979; 101(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 386650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine contraceptive device embedded within submucous myoma.
    Wang JH; Wang LQ; Shang-Guan XJ; Huang LL
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Aug; 50(4):397-9. PubMed ID: 20716271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Invading of intrauterine contraceptive device into the sigmoid colon through uterine perforation caused by a blunt trauma.
    Davoodabadi A; Mohammadzadeh M; Amirbeigi M; Jazayeri H
    Chin J Traumatol; 2015; 18(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 26764547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ultrasonographically guided intrauterine contraceptive device removal before chorionic villus sampling.
    Ranzini AC; Wapner RJ; Davis GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):603-5. PubMed ID: 7645641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Ultrasonic diagnosis of complications of intrauterine contraception].
    Demidov VN
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1986 Sep; (9):47-9. PubMed ID: 2947496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of ultrasounds in real time in the localization of intrauterine contraceptive devices (author's transl).
    Paparella P; Ciorlandino C; Gentili P; Sintoni L
    Acta Med Rom; 1980; 18(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 12337638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Penetration of the bladder by a perforating intrauterine contraceptive device: a sonographic diagnosis.
    Caspi B; Rabinerson D; Appelman Z; Kaplan B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 8807768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices on colonisation of the cervix by actinomyces-like organisms.
    Mao K; Guillebaud J
    Contraception; 1984 Dec; 30(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 6529911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Location of the missing intra-uterine contraceptive device. Examination by ultrasound B-technique and the Beolocator method.
    Jouppila P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1975; 54(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 1114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Symptomatic secondary vesical calculus formed on an intrauterine contraceptive device inserted 25 years previously.
    Al-Awadi KA; Zaghloul AS; Kehinde EO
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):483-6. PubMed ID: 21335943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
    Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proceedings: Sonographic localization of intra-uterine contraceptive devices.
    Watt I; Halliwell M; Ross FG; Watt EM
    Br J Radiol; 1976 Aug; 49(584):731-2. PubMed ID: 953401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Migrated IUCD resulting in increased urinary frequency.
    Olowoyeye OA; Tijani KT
    Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2007; 17(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 18318095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasound-guided intrauterine removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy.
    Stubblefield PG; Fuller AF; Foster SC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Dec; 72(6):961-4. PubMed ID: 3054659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The identification of IUDs by ultrasound in the uterine cavity.
    Quakernack K; Schmidt EH; Lieder B; Beller FK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1975; 4(6):203-7. PubMed ID: 1172468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The importance of ultrasonography in infertile women with "forgotten" intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Ron-El R; Weinraub Z; Langer R; Bukovsky I; Caspi E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 161(1):211-2. PubMed ID: 2665497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Uterine perforation and embedding by intrauterine device: evaluation by US and hysterography.
    Rosenblatt R; Zakin D; Stern WZ; Kutcher R
    Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):765-70. PubMed ID: 3903858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of intrauterine contraceptive device on uterine haemostasis: a morphological study.
    Aparicio SR; Bradbury K; Bird CC; Foley ME; Jenkins DM; Clayton JK; Scott JS; Rajah SM; McNicol GP
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Apr; 86(4):314-24. PubMed ID: 435419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.