130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4131045)
1. Letter: Cervical screening.
Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
Lancet; 1974 Mar; 1(7854):401-2. PubMed ID: 4131045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of population screening for carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Finland.
Hakama M
Maturitas; 1985 May; 7(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 4021826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of screening on the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Finland.
Hakulinen T; Hakama M
Nowotwory; 1985; 35(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 3831943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Letter: Screening for cervical cancer.
Lancet; 1974 Jun; 1(7868):1221. PubMed ID: 4134347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer. Mass screening, incidence and mortality in Finland.
Timonen S; Pyörälä T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1977; 67():13-9. PubMed ID: 269640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cervical carcinoma incidence in the Republic of Karelia. Epidemiology and screening].
Mikhet'ko AA
Vopr Onkol; 2010; 56(6):660-3. PubMed ID: 21395120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cervix neoplasms and mass screening].
Hakama M
Duodecim; 1970; 86(9):528-35. PubMed ID: 5463389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
Louhivuori K
Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 1782637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer screening programs. II. Screening for carcinoma of the cervix.
Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1013-26. PubMed ID: 776379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved prognosis of cervical cancer due to comprehensive screening.
Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
Lancet; 1971 Jan; 1(7689):74-6. PubMed ID: 4099228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [HPV vaccination: the bewilderment of the staff engaged in traditional cervical cancer screening].
Montanari GR; Confortini M; Ghiringhello B
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(4):189-91. PubMed ID: 18019202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved prognosis for cervical cancers due to comprehensive screening.
Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 4501868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cervical cancer and mass screening].
Hakama M
Duodecim; 1970; 86(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 5421372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and mass screening].
Timonen S; Nieminen U
Duodecim; 1970; 86(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 5421373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
