These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 413423)

  • 1. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography.
    Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography.
    Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality, diagnostic certainty, and accuracy: comparison of conventional and digital urograms.
    Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 3188300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of four rare-earth film-screen combinations.
    Nettle JR; Ritchings RT
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Oct; 53(634):965-8. PubMed ID: 7426919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two different T-grain films in rare-earth screens with a standard film-screen combination for intravenous pyelography and bone examinations.
    Logan H; Daly L; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):237-40. PubMed ID: 2702380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of rare earth screen/film combinations.
    Rossi RP; Hendee WR; Ahrens CR
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 981629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system.
    Schmidt RA; Doi K; Sekiya M; Xu XW; Giger ML; Lu CT; Mojtahedi S; MacMahon H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2108553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of film-screen combination in a contrast detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 1: Contrast detail diagram].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evaluation of high-speed screen-film combinations in angiography.
    Ovitt TW; Moore R; Armplatz K
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 1111014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three- tier rare-earth imaging system.
    Brodeur AE; Silberstein MJ; Graviss ER; Ferguson TL; Ortmeyer KM; Nalesnik WJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Apr; 136(4):755-8. PubMed ID: 6784471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wiener spectrum of radiographic systems: comparison of different evaluation methods.
    Bregant P; De Denaro M; De Guarrini F; Borasi G
    Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 9251741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)].
    Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M
    Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
    Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.