These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 413423)

  • 21. [Experimental study of intensifying screens used in diagnostic radiography (author's transl)].
    de Moras Y; Lucas P; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M; Bausmayer J
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Mar; 59(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 650634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of screen-film speed characteristics.
    Reynolds J; Skucas J; Gorski J
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):711-3. PubMed ID: 1251025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interactive, mathematical, and sequential consultative methods in diagnosing renal masses on excretory urograms.
    Ferrell WR; Hillman BJ; Brewer ML; Amendola MA; Thornbury JR
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24(6):456-62. PubMed ID: 2521127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The dependence of radiographic mottle on beam quality.
    Barnes GT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Nov; 127(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 973671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Simplifying radiological examinations. The urogram as a model.
    Hillman B; Abrams HL; Hessel SJ; Herbert S; Benazzi RB; Gerson DE
    Lancet; 1979 May; 1(8125):1068-71. PubMed ID: 86785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reduction of radiation dose in radiologic examination of patients with scoliosis.
    Hellström G; Irstam L; Nachemson A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1983; 8(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 6867854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An asymmetric screen pair for angiography.
    Moore WE; Cromwell LD
    Radiology; 1980 Sep; 136(3):787-8. PubMed ID: 7403563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Excretory urography in current practice: evidence against overutilization.
    Doubilet P; McNeil BJ; Van Houten FX; Berenberg A; Ratnofsky S; Greenes RA; Anderson JW; Mellins HZ; Abrams HL
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):607-11. PubMed ID: 3969460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Film-screen sharpness in complex motion tomography.
    Wayrynen RE; Holland RS; Schwenker RP
    Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 852953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a new x-ray film with reduced crossover.
    Rao GU; Fatouros PP
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(3):226-8. PubMed ID: 470848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Letter: Evaluation of a new screen/film combination.
    Hay GA
    Br J Radiol; 1976 Mar; 49(579):294. PubMed ID: 1276615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the image quality of 105mm film with conventional film.
    Skucas J; Gorski JW
    Radiology; 1976 Feb; 118(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 1250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Receptor saturation in roentgen films.
    Strid KG; Reichmann S
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1980; 21(6):789-96. PubMed ID: 7234494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Balloon compression in excretory urography.
    Rothfield NJ
    Radiology; 1969 Mar; 92(3):645. PubMed ID: 5781690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The value of the prone roentgenogram during excretory urography.
    Koehler PR; Friedenberg MJ
    J Urol; 1965 Nov; 94(5):625-7. PubMed ID: 5846203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ureteral compression device for excretory urography.
    Daughtridge TG
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1965 Oct; 95(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 5832194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved abdominal compression band for excretory urography.
    Kendig TA
    J Urol; 1969 May; 101(5):773-4. PubMed ID: 5780611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography.
    Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography.
    Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Image quality, diagnostic certainty, and accuracy: comparison of conventional and digital urograms.
    Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 3188300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.