These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4137798)

  • 21. [Unusual laboratory results in normal subjects].
    Rümke CL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1975 Sep; 119(37):1411-3. PubMed ID: 1178076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Misinterpretation and abuse of laboratory tests by clinicians.
    Zieve L
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1966 Feb; 134(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 5220677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory results that should be ignored.
    Elston DM
    MedGenMed; 2006 Oct; 8(4):9. PubMed ID: 17415291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A systematic program of quality control in clinical microbiology.
    Glasser L; Bosley GS; Boring JR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1971 Sep; 56(3):379-83. PubMed ID: 4937606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using the laboratory effectively without running up the bill unnecessarily.
    Bean B; De Cresce R
    Postgrad Med; 1989 Jan; 85(1):75-8, 81-2. PubMed ID: 2911556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using Big Data to Determine Reference Values for Laboratory Tests.
    Obstfeld AE; Master SR; Miller WG
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1495-1496. PubMed ID: 30304419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Are laboratory results reliable? Serious factors are involved].
    Theodorsson E
    Lakartidningen; 1997 May; 94(22):2092-6. PubMed ID: 9213666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiologist's guide to the use of the laboratory in diagnosing rheumatic diseases.
    Sack KE; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 6972050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. False-positive results of Campylobacter rapid antigen testing.
    Myers AL; Jackson MA; Selvarangan R
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2011 Jun; 30(6):542. PubMed ID: 21587030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS: THE CONCEPT OF INVERSE PROBABILITY.
    KANNER O
    N C Med J; 1965 Aug; 26():321-8. PubMed ID: 14341188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. False positive bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan: Effect of host and cut-off value.
    Farmakiotis D; Le A; Weiss Z; Ismail N; Kubiak DW; Koo S
    Mycoses; 2019 Mar; 62(3):204-213. PubMed ID: 30387195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. TESTS FOR SYPHILIS. THE INCREASING INCIDENCE OF BIOLOGIC FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS AS MEASURED BY TREPONEMA PALLIDUM IMMOBILIZATION.
    CARPENTER CM; LECLAIR RA; BOAK RA; MILLER JN
    Calif Med; 1965 Jul; 103(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 14336784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing: Audit from a clinical immunology laboratory.
    Phatak S; Aggarwal A; Agarwal V; Lawrence A; Misra R
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Jun; 20(6):774-778. PubMed ID: 27457216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hospital distilled water as source of false-positive acid-fast smears.
    Kelly MT
    Lancet; 1978 Mar; 1(8062):510. PubMed ID: 76062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability, decision rules, and the value of repeated tests.
    Politser P
    Med Decis Making; 1982; 2(1):47-69. PubMed ID: 7169931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data.
    Galen RS
    Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 6769520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enteral nutrition may cause false-positive results of Aspergillus galactomannan assay in absence of gastrointestinal diseases.
    Girmenia C; Santilli S; Ballarò D; Del Giudice I; Armiento D; Mauro FR
    Mycoses; 2011 Nov; 54(6):e883-4. PubMed ID: 21623937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening for disease: Definitions and criteria.
    Whitby LG
    Lancet; 1974 Oct; 2(7884):819-22. PubMed ID: 4138246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. INTERPRETATION OF LABORATORY RESULTS.
    PRYCE JD
    Postgrad Med; 1964 Jul; 36():A56-74. PubMed ID: 14174395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using Big Data to Determine Reference Values for Laboratory Tests-Reply.
    Manrai AK; Patel CJ; Ioannidis JPA
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1496. PubMed ID: 30304422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.