BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4138326)

  • 1. Letter: Increase of premalignant cervical lesions in teenagers.
    Punnonen R; Grönroos M; Peltonen R
    Lancet; 1974 Oct; 2(7886):949. PubMed ID: 4138326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Prevalence of preclinical lesions of the cervix uteri].
    Dabancens A
    Rev Med Chil; 1986 Jun; 114(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 3575955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of a Pap smear program and suggestions for its implementation.
    Boyes DA
    Cancer; 1981 Jul; 48(2 Suppl):613-21. PubMed ID: 7272982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genital herpes virus findings in relation to cervical neoplasia.
    Royston I; Aurelian L; Davis HJ
    J Reprod Med; 1970 Apr; 4(4):9-13. PubMed ID: 4328889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cytological screening for precancerous lesions of the cervix.
    Sng I
    Singapore Med J; 1987 Oct; 28(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 3433107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis of seroepidemiological studies of herpesvirus type 2 and carcinoma of the cervix.
    Rawls WE; Adam E; Melnick JL
    Cancer Res; 1973 Jun; 33(6):1477-82. PubMed ID: 4352385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epithelial dysplasia of the cervix uteri. The population screening for cervical carcinoma in the County of Maribo, 1967-69.
    Berget A
    Dan Med Bull; 1974 Aug; 21(5):169-71. PubMed ID: 4851895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of a program for the control of cervicouterine carcinoma].
    Niedbalski M; Pettinelli E; Boero D; Varela J; Díaz G
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1977; 42(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 613389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Vaginal cytologic studies on a venerologic clientele].
    Hjortishoj A; Hastrup J; Schultz H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1974 Jul; 136(29):1639-41. PubMed ID: 4407969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Computer-assisted screening for cervical carcinoma--the results for a 10-year period].
    Neumann HG; Seidenschnur G
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1987; 57(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 3296989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The natural history of Pap test screening in a rural population.
    Rosenfeld JA
    Tenn Med; 1998 May; 91(5):179-82. PubMed ID: 9584605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective studies of the association of genital herpes simplex infection and cervical anaplasia.
    Nahmias AJ; Naib ZM; Josey WE; Franklin E; Jenkins R
    Cancer Res; 1973 Jun; 33(6):1491-7. PubMed ID: 4352387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A plea for colposcopy.
    Bacaj T
    Va Med Mon (1918); 1975 Jun; 102(6):465-7. PubMed ID: 1154852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
    Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Am J Epidemiol; 1976 May; 103(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 1274953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mass screening for cervical cancer in a high risk group].
    Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Duodecim; 1975; 91(9):579-85. PubMed ID: 1175484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of detectability of uterine cervix cancer in the Warsaw area during 1965-1966].
    Misiewicz L
    Ginekol Pol; 1968 Jul; 39(7):763-6. PubMed ID: 5723446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An epidemiologic and serologic comparison of uterine carcinoma in situ and squamous dysplasia.
    Thomas DB; Anderson RI
    Am J Epidemiol; 1974 Aug; 100(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 4368399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.