These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 414257)

  • 1. A description of the nicotine stimulus and tests of its generalization to amphetamine.
    Chance WT; Murfin D; Krynock GM; Rosecrans JA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1977 Nov; 55(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 414257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influencing the specificity of drug mixture discriminations by varying the training procedure.
    Stolerman IP; Mariathasan EA; White JA
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Nov; 10(6-7):657-64. PubMed ID: 10780507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discriminative stimulus properties of fenfluramine in an operant task: an analysis of its cue function.
    Goudie AJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1977 Jun; 53(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 407619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats.
    Bardo MT; Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Crooks PA; Dwoskin LP
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1083-7. PubMed ID: 9408217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement.
    Stolerman IP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 97(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 2496419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paroxetine, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitor with antidepressant properties, lacks amphetamine-like stimulus properties in an operant drug discrimination bioassay in rodents.
    Goudie AJ; Dubicki W; Leathley M
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 1988 Mar; 40(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 2899149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
    Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavior as a stimulus: joint effects of d-amphetamine and pentobarbital.
    Branch MN
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1974 Apr; 189(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 4823297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus properties of d-amphetamine as compared to l-amphetamine.
    Schechter MD
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1978 Feb; 47(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 631192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AND and AND-OR drug mixture discriminations in rats: generalization to single drugs and drug mixtures.
    Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Mar; 143(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 10227080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of drug-state change on discrimination performance.
    Cole SO; Gay PE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1976 May; 47(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 959466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of prior experience on differential learning under amphetamine.
    Grilly DM
    Psychopharmacologia; 1975 Sep; 43(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 1187959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 5-HT3 receptor partial agonist MD-354 (meta-chlorophenylguanidine) enhances the discriminative stimulus actions of (+)amphetamine in rats.
    Dukat M; Wesolowska A; Young R; Glennon RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007; 87(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 17540440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of stimulus duration and d-amphetamine in pigeons: a psychophysical analysis.
    Stubbs DA; Thomas JR
    Psychopharmacologia; 1974 May; 36(4):313-22. PubMed ID: 4847385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination and self-administration of nicotine by inbred strains of mice.
    Stolerman IP; Naylor C; Elmer GI; Goldberg SR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Jan; 141(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 10027511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of training paradigm on specificity of drug mixture discriminations.
    Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 10515322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus properties of some analogues of 4-methylaminorex.
    Russell BR; Beresford RA; Schmierer DM; McNaughton N; Clark CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1995; 51(2-3):375-8. PubMed ID: 7667356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of D-amphetamine on performance under a multiple schedule in the rat.
    Clark FC; Steele BJ
    Psychopharmacologia; 1966; 9(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 5983914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of nikethamide, picrotoxin and strychnine on 'amphetamine-state'.
    Huang JT; Ho BT
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1974 Nov; 29(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 4471362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. d-Amphetamine and fixed-interval performance: effects of establishing the drug as a discriminative stimulus.
    Poling AD; Appel JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 Oct; 9(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 733834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.