88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 415623)
1. The case for cervical cancer screening.
Ibrahim MA
Am J Public Health; 1978 Feb; 68(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 415623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cost-benefit of expanding cervical cancer screening].
Deng J; Tan H; Yang T; Huang X; Zhou S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 May; 35(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 20543471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Current status, problems and answers in cervical cancer screening].
Matsunaga G; Tase T
Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Oct; 62 Suppl 10():237-40. PubMed ID: 15535243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.
Conn Med; 1983 Jun; 47(6):367. PubMed ID: 6411426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in developing countries.
Suba EJ; Frable WJ; Raab SS
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(14):1535-6; author reply 1535-6. PubMed ID: 16598056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cytology--cost effective considerations.
Medley G; Drake M
Aust Health Rev; 1982 May; 5(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 10309737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in the context of high cervical cancer incidence and low screening coverage.
Võrno T; Lutsar K; Uusküla A; Padrik L; Raud T; Reile R; Nahkur O; Kiivet RA
Vaccine; 2017 Nov; 35(46):6329-6335. PubMed ID: 28899625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for cervical neoplasia.
Cronjé HS; Niemand I
S Afr Med J; 1995 Mar; 85(3):184. PubMed ID: 7777979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
Ridsdale LL
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Cervical Screening Programme.
BMJ; 1990 Nov; 301(6760):1100. PubMed ID: 2123413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
Payne L; Lavis P
Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cancer of the cervix uteri: analysis of the cost-benefit and efficacy of opportunistic screening versus organized screening].
Castronovo V; Foidart JM; Boniver J
Rev Med Liege; 1998 May; 53(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 9689888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical smears.
Br Med J; 1977 Jul; 2(6079):122-3. PubMed ID: 406005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who should decide how effective cervical cancer screening will be?
Austin RM
J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 10319298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Is cervical screening justified in adolescents?].
Barrasso R; Monsonego J
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1996 Feb; 24(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 8611929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The dawn of novel STI prevention methods: modelling potential unintended effects of changes in cervical cancer screening guidelines on trichomoniasis.
Rönn MM; Turner KM
Sex Transm Infect; 2018 May; 94(3):161-162. PubMed ID: 29545472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. VIA/VILI is more suitable for cervical cancer prevention in Chinese poverty-stricken region: a health economic evaluation.
Xie Y; Tan X; Shao H; Liu Q; Tou J; Zhang Y; Luo Q; Xiang Q
BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 28122530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.
Fahs MC; Plichta SB; Mandelblatt JS
Pharmacoeconomics; 1996 Mar; 9(3):211-30. PubMed ID: 10160098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Costs and effects of alternative screening programs against cervical cancer].
Gyrd-Hansen D; Hølund B; Andersen P
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Aug; 158(35):4912-5. PubMed ID: 8801698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Outcome and future of mass screening for uterine cervical cancer].
Noda K; Tejima K
Gan No Rinsho; 1983 May; 29(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 6410103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
