BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 416033)

  • 1. Histologic response to porous PMMA implant materials.
    Nathanson D; Gettleman L; Schnitman P; Shklar G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Jan; 12(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 416033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of PMMA in expansion dental implants.
    Leigh JA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 1100634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A vitreous carbon-polymethacrylate composite for dental implants.
    Hodosh M; Shklar G; Povar M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jan; 9(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 1176473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength and biocompatibility of polymethacrylate-silica composite dental implant materials.
    Hodosh M; Shklar G; Gettleman L; Povar M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Feb; 43(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 6243363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porous, heat cured poly (methyl methacrylate) for dental implants.
    Gettleman L; Nathanson D; Myerson RL; Hodosh M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 1176506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition.
    Thomas KA; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Oct; 19(8):875-901. PubMed ID: 3880349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A high-modulus polymer for porous orthopedic implants: biomechanical compatibility of porous implants.
    Spector M; Michno MJ; Smarook WH; Kwiatkowski GT
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Sep; 12(5):665-77. PubMed ID: 701302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction of bone and hydroxyapatite filled 4-META/MMA-TBB bone cement in in vitro and in vivo environments.
    Lee RR
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1996; 48(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 9462058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of large bone defects with calcium phosphate ceramics--an experimental study.
    Patka P; den Otter G; de Groot K; Driessen AA
    Neth J Surg; 1985 Apr; 37(2):38-44. PubMed ID: 4000517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hard tissue replacement (HTR) polymer as an implant material.
    Amler MH; LeGeros RZ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Aug; 24(8):1079-89. PubMed ID: 2394764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigations with bioactivated polymethylmethacrylates.
    Hennig W; Blencke BA; Brömer H; Deutscher KK; Gross A; Ege W
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Jan; 13(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 429387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation of the mechanical properties of PMMA to suit osteoporotic cancellous bone.
    Boger A; Bisig A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schneider E
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2008; 19(9):1125-42. PubMed ID: 18727856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 12 month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite.
    Itokawa H; Hiraide T; Moriya M; Fujimoto M; Nagashima G; Suzuki R; Fujimoto T
    Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(33):4922-7. PubMed ID: 17707904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aspects of bone healing and bone substitute incorporation. An experimental study in rabbit skull bone defects.
    Isaksson S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992; 84():1-46. PubMed ID: 1334579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of bulk versus particulate polymethylmethacrylate on bone.
    Goodman SB; Fornasier VL; Kei J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):255-62. PubMed ID: 3289814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reaction of bone to methacrylate: interface remodelling.
    Portigliatti Barbos M; Bacchini B; Balbo C; Viglino C
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1991; 57(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 1950507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT.
    Jones AC; Arns CH; Sheppard AP; Hutmacher DW; Milthorpe BK; Knackstedt MA
    Biomaterials; 2007 May; 28(15):2491-504. PubMed ID: 17335896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone attachment to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant with porous surface.
    Mattila RH; Laurila P; Rekola J; Gunn J; Lassila LV; Mäntylä T; Aho AJ; Vallittu PK
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Jun; 5(5):1639-46. PubMed ID: 19268643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Composite implants for orthopedic applications: in vivo evaluation of candidate resins.
    Jacobs ML; Black J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 1176503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repair of bone segment defects with surface porous fiber-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) composite prosthesis: histomorphometric incorporation model and characterization by SEM.
    Hautamäki MP; Aho AJ; Alander P; Rekola J; Gunn J; Strandberg N; Vallittu PK
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Aug; 79(4):555-64. PubMed ID: 18766491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.