These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 417431)

  • 1. The risk of abbreviating the major crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion.
    Oberman HA; Barnes BA; Friedman BA
    Transfusion; 1978; 18(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 417431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pretransfusion blood group serology. Limited value of the antiglobulin phase of the crossmatch when a careful screening test for unexpected antibodies is performed.
    Heistø H
    Transfusion; 1979; 19(6):761-3. PubMed ID: 118557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incompatible crossmatch following nonreactive antibody detection test. Frequency and cause.
    Mintz PD; Haines AL; Sullivan MF
    Transfusion; 1982; 22(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7071913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The risk of an overt hemolytic transfusion reaction following the use of an immediate spin crossmatch.
    Shulman IA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Apr; 114(4):412-4. PubMed ID: 2322101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective study to determine the safety of omitting the antiglobulin crossmatch from pretransfusion testing.
    Heddle NM; O'Hoski P; Singer J; McBride JA; Ali MA; Kelton JG
    Br J Haematol; 1992 Aug; 81(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 1390245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience with a cost-effective crossmatch protocol.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Kent DR; Jacobs VL; Nakayama RK; Malone SA
    JAMA; 1985 Jul; 254(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 3999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of the crossmatch in testing for serologic incompatibility.
    Oberman HA; Barnes BA; Steiner EA
    Transfusion; 1982; 22(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 6801826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposal for compatibility testing incorporating the manual hexadimethrine bromide (Polybrene) test.
    Steane EA; Steane SM; Montgomery SR; Pearson JR
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 4071598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The manual polybrene test: a simple and rapid procedure for detection of red cell antibodies.
    Lalezari P; Jiang AF
    Transfusion; 1980; 20(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 6768173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sensitivity and specificity of the immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Meyer EA; Shulman IA
    Transfusion; 1989 Feb; 29(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 2919433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multicenter prospective observational study on the use of type and screen method versus conventional type and crossmatch policy for pre-transfusion testing in the Indian population.
    Mathur A; Jindal A; Tiwari AK; Bhuyan D; Jagannathan L; Sawant RB; Basu S; Reddy M; Datta SS
    Immunohematology; 2022 Sep; 38(3):100-105. PubMed ID: 36190198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term in vivo survival of Rh(D)-negative donor red cells in a patient with anti-LW.
    Chaplin H; Hunter VL; Rosche ME; Shirey RS
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 3918363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of delayed centrifugation or reading on the detection of ABO incompatibility by the immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Shulman IA; Calderón C
    Transfusion; 1991; 31(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 2003320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crossmatch compatible blood for patients with anti-P1.
    Cronin CA; Pohl BA; Miller WV
    Transfusion; 1978; 18(6):728-30. PubMed ID: 726020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions following antibody screening and immediate-spin crossmatching.
    Pinkerton PH; Coovadia AS; Goldstein J
    Transfusion; 1992; 32(9):814-7. PubMed ID: 1471244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Type and screen method and Coombs crossmatch method for pretransfusion testing: A prospective comparative study in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi.
    Anu KD; Pahuja S; Sharma G
    Asian J Transfus Sci; 2022; 16(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 36199420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Tube, Gel, and Immunochromatographic Strip Methods for Evaluation of Blood Transfusion Compatibility in Horses.
    Luethy D; Owens SD; Stefanovski D; Nolen-Walston R; Giger U
    J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 30(6):1864-1871. PubMed ID: 27770509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of serum versus EDTA plasma in canine major crossmatch reactions.
    Caudill MN; Meichner K; Koenig A; Berghaus RD; Garner B
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Sep; 50(3):319-326. PubMed ID: 34486139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a commercial immunochromatographic strip crossmatch kit and standard laboratory crossmatch methods for blood transfusion compatibility in dogs.
    Zaremba RM; Brooks AC; Thomovsky EJ; Moore GE; Johnson PA
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2022 Sep; 32(5):582-591. PubMed ID: 35838534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting the issue: can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted?
    Judd WJ; Fullen DR; Steiner EA; Davenport RD; Knafl PC
    Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 10204593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.