These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4183423)
1. Assessment of auditory and visual function using averaged evoked responses. McCandless GA Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1969 Feb; 26(2):237. PubMed ID: 4183423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory and visually evoked responses: their use in navy medicine. Fournier M US Navy Med; 1980 Dec; 71(12):15-7. PubMed ID: 6940321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Vision screening and hearing in the elderly. Miller D; Stern R Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1974 Apr; 53(4):128-33. PubMed ID: 4822082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of acuity, color vision and shape perception by statistical evaluation of evoked potentials. John ER Ann Ophthalmol; 1974 Jan; 6(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 4812587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychophysical tests of vision and hearing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Regan D Adv Neurol; 1981; 31():217-37. PubMed ID: 7325044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New techniques of hearing assessment. Martin WH; Schwegler JW; Gleeson AL; Shi YB Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Jun; 27(3):487-510. PubMed ID: 8065755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Various audiometry tests designated as objective]. Freyss G; Legent F Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1969 Mar; 86(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 5769827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Proceedings: ERA-findings in paracusic children with normal auditory threshold]. Schunicht R Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1973 Dec; 205(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 4785506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Visual electrophysiology and objective visual function]. Liu RJ; Zhu GY; Fan LH Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 May; 18(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 12596599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Electrophysiologic hearing evaluation in childhood--a critical assessment]. Begall K; von Specht H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 1():129-48. PubMed ID: 8012235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Usefulness of visual evoked potentials in visual acuity examination]. Szabela DA; Pałenga-Pydyn D Klin Oczna; 2001; 103(2-3):141-5. PubMed ID: 11873414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of hearing and auditory nerve function by combining ABR, DPOAE and eABR tests into a single recording session. Polak M; Eshraghi AA; Nehme O; Ahsan S; Guzman J; Delgado RE; He J; Telischi FF; Balkany TJ; Van De Water TR J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Apr; 134(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 15003380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Correlation of subjective and objective methods of evaluating hearing threshold]. Komazec Z; Milosević D; Filipović D Med Pregl; 2001; 54(7-8):332-7. PubMed ID: 11905181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP. Almoqbel F; Leat SJ; Irving E Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 18761477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates. Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]