These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. New concepts in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Roy M; Townsend DE; DiSaia PJ; Morrow CP J Fam Pract; 1974; 1(3-4):10-3. PubMed ID: 4141723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The value of colposcopy in evaluating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy. Behnam K; Mariano E Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1982; 4(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7094819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. False positive cervical cytology: an important reason for colposcopy. Feldman MJ; Seeve CC; Srebnik E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 129(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 900175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation. Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The combined use of cytology and colposcopy in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix. Lozowski MS; Mishriki Y; Talebian F; Solitare G Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 6954809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cytologic, colposcopic, and histologic correlation in young females. Creatsas G; Caglar H; Hreshchyshyn M; Gallego M J Adolesc Health Care; 1981 Sep; 2(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 7333942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy. Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outpatient evaluation of patients with atypical Papanicolaou smears: contribution of endocervical curettage. Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 126(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 961737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation of colposcopically directed biopsy and conization with histologic diagnosis of cervical lesions. Savage EW J Reprod Med; 1975 Dec; 15(6):211-3. PubMed ID: 1195261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid in exfoliated cervicovaginal cells as a predictor of cervical neoplasia in a high-risk population. Ritter DB; Kadish AS; Vermund SH; Romney SL; Villari D; Burk RD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Dec; 159(6):1517-25. PubMed ID: 2849881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The clinician's response to the abnormal smear. Gordon H Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 8(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 7261528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability and relationship of colposcopical, cytological and histopathological findings in the diagnostic process. Milenković V; Sparić R; Dotlić J; Tulić L; Mirković L; Milenković S; Atanacković J Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Oct; 69(10):869-73. PubMed ID: 23155608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Comparative colposcopic, cytological and histological studies of the uterine cervix during pregnancy]. Scharnke HD; Jorde A; Peschel HG; Sielaff E Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(25):1547-52. PubMed ID: 1020511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnosis and treatment of preinvasive and microinvasive cervicocarcinoma. Maggino T; Marchetti M; Marchesoni D; Minucci D; Menighetti M; Valente S Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1982; 3(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 7166175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Correlation between the cytology, coposcopy and the histopathology of abnormal lesions of the cervix]. Michon B; Demianczuk N Union Med Can; 1977 May; 106(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 867611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Office diagnosis in patients with abnormal cervicovaginal cytosmears: correlation of colposcopic biopsy and cytologic findings. Crapanzano JT Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Aug; 113(7):967-72. PubMed ID: 4635749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]