These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4197768)
1. Control of surface wound infection: skin versus synthetic grafts. Saymen DG; Nathan P; Holder IA; Hill EO; Macmillan BG Appl Microbiol; 1973 Jun; 25(6):921-34. PubMed ID: 4197768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of a synthetic dressing formed on a burn wound in rats: a comparison of allografts, collagen sheets, and polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate in the control of wound infection. Nathan P; Macmillan BG; Holder IA Appl Microbiol; 1974 Sep; 28(3):465-8. PubMed ID: 4213719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of synthetic and biological materials for wound dressings. Guldalian J; Jelenko C; Callaway D; McKnight JT J Trauma; 1973 Jan; 13(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 4568978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of a collagen dressing on contaminated surgical wounds in rats. Burget A; Nathan P; Holder IA; Macmillan BG Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1976 Dec; 343(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 796601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infected surface wound: an experimental model and a method for the quantitation of bacteria in infected tissues. Saymen DG; Nathan P; Holder IA; Hill EO; Macmillan BG Appl Microbiol; 1972 Mar; 23(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 4623279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of human amniotic membranes on the bacteria population of infected rat burns. Robson MC; Krizek TJ Ann Surg; 1973 Feb; 177(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 4633388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of antibacterial effects among three foams used with negative pressure wound therapy in an ex vivo equine perfused wound model. Van Hecke LL; Haspeslagh M; Hermans K; Martens AM Am J Vet Res; 2016 Dec; 77(12):1325-1331. PubMed ID: 27901391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bacterial contamination of skin used as a biological dressing. A potential hazard. Monafo WW; Tandon SN; Bradley RE; Condict C JAMA; 1976 Mar; 235(12):1248-9. PubMed ID: 765519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In situ production of a synthetic barrier dressing for burn wounds in rats. Nathan P; MacMillan BG; Holder IA Infect Immun; 1975 Aug; 12(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 808499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties. Martineau L; Shek PN Burns; 2006 Mar; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occlusive wound dressings to prevent bacterial invasion and wound infection. Mertz PM; Marshall DA; Eaglstein WH J Am Acad Dermatol; 1985 Apr; 12(4):662-8. PubMed ID: 3921574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of Acticoat Burn Dressing for management of microbial contamination in cultured skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice. Supp AP; Neely AN; Supp DM; Warden GD; Boyce ST J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 15879745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Antiseptic effect of compound lysostaphin disinfectant and its preventive effect on infection of artificial dermis after graft on full-thickness skin defect wound in rats]. Jin J; Zhou H; Cui ZC; Wang L; Luo PF; Ji SZ; Hu XY; Ma B; Wang GY; Zhu SH; Xia ZF Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 34(4):225-232. PubMed ID: 29690741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]