These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 420369)

  • 1. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys.
    Siemiatycki J
    Am J Public Health; 1979 Mar; 69(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 420369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys.
    Siemiatycki J; Campbell S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Aug; 120(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 6465127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
    McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys.
    Harris LE; Weinberger M; Tierney WM
    Med Care; 1997 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 8998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys.
    Siemiatycki J; Campbell S; Richardson L; Aubert D
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Aug; 120(2):302-14. PubMed ID: 6465128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: mail, telephone and personal home interview.
    O'Toole BI; Battistutta D; Long A; Crouch K
    Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Aug; 124(2):317-28. PubMed ID: 3728446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of mail and telephone interview strategies for mental health surveys.
    Fournier L; Kovess V
    Can J Psychiatry; 1993 Oct; 38(8):525-33. PubMed ID: 8242527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
    Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transitioning the Healthy Chicago Survey From a Telephone Mode to Self-administered by Mail Mode.
    Unangst J; Lewis T; Laflamme E; Prachand N; Weaver K
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2022 May-Jun 01; 28(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 35334486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health status assessments using the Veterans SF-12 and SF-36: methods for evaluating otucomes in the Veterans Health Administration.
    Jones D; Kazis L; Lee A; Rogers W; Skinner K; Cassar L; Wilson N; Hendricks A
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2001 Jul; 24(3):68-86. PubMed ID: 11433558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches.
    Sinclair M; O'Toole J; Malawaraarachchi M; Leder K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():132. PubMed ID: 22938205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.
    Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparison of 2 survey methods: the telephone versus the mails in the diabetic population of a health center].
    Martínez Ibáñez MT; Hernández González E; Méndez García CD; Gómez Juárez JL; Salas Hospital JC; Vázquez Veloso C; Solsona Gimeno R
    Aten Primaria; 1999 Mar; 23(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 10333603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members.
    Fowler FJ; Gallagher PM; Stringfellow VL; Zaslavsky AM; Thompson JW; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2002 Mar; 40(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 11880792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of follow-up methodology and completeness on apparent clinical outcome of fundoplication.
    Ludemann R; Watson DI; Jamieson GG
    Am J Surg; 2003 Aug; 186(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 12885606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey.
    Feveile H; Olsen O; Hogh A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():27. PubMed ID: 17592653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the accuracy of health behaviour surveys be improved by non-response follow-ups?
    Helakorpi S; Mäkelä P; Holstila A; Uutela A; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 25(3):487-90. PubMed ID: 25477127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys.
    Beebe TJ; McRae JA; Harrison PA; Davern ME; Quinlan KB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 15868697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different methods of collecting data: mail, telephone and filter data collection issues in utility measurement.
    Hawthorne G
    Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):1081-8. PubMed ID: 14651425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.