These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4206797)

  • 1. Microsurgical studies. II. Corneal endothelial healing and posterior wound closure after "through and through" suturing.
    Sanchez J; Polack FM; Eve FR; Troutman RC
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1974 Jan; 9(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 4206797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microsurgical sutures. I. Evaluation of various types of needles and sutures for anterior segment surgery.
    Polack FM; Sanchez J; Eve FR
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1974 Jan; 9(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 4594995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Penetrating keratoplasty with use of through-and-through nylon sutures.
    Massey JY; Hanna C
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1974 May; 91(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 4207012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The corneal host-graft function. Physiopathology of the scar.
    Polack FM
    Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol; 1975 Feb; 35(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 130112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the reaction of the cornea to nylon and stainless steel sutures: an animal study.
    Rijneveld WJ; Jongebloed WL; Worst JG; Houtman WA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 72(3-4):297-307. PubMed ID: 2483135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaction of the rabbit corneal endothelium to nylon sutures. A SEM study.
    Jongebloed WL; van der Veen G; Kalicharan D; Rijneveld WJ; Houtman WA; Worst JG
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1990 Oct; 75(3-4):351-8. PubMed ID: 2090411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo evaluation of nylon suture material by the scanning electron microscope.
    Gregorius FK; Rand RW
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Sep; 143(3):429-32. PubMed ID: 785639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental corneal wound strength. 7-0 Silk vs 10-0 monofilament nylon.
    Chandler JW; Sugar J; Gasset A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1974 Aug; 92(2):155-6. PubMed ID: 4136248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement of sutures used in corneal incisions.
    Eve FR; Troutman RC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1976 Nov; 82(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 826162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wound dehiscence with keratoplasty: complication of the continuous-suture technique.
    Brown SI; Tragakis MP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1971 Jul; 72(1):115-6. PubMed ID: 4936921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stainless steel as suturing material in human- and rabbit corneas: a SEM-study.
    Jongebloed WL; Rijneveld WJ; Cuperus PL; van Andel P; Worst JG
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988; 70(2-3):145-54. PubMed ID: 3069406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Syneture stainless STEEL suture. A collective review of its performance in surgical wound closure.
    Edlich RF; Drake DB; Rodeheaver GT; Winters KL; Greene JA; Gubler KD; Long WB; Britt LD; Winters SP; Scott CC; Lin KY
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 16566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of 10-0 running nylon versus 8-0 silk on the healing of corneal gragts.
    Gasset AR; Bellows RT; Holtmann HW; Gravenstein N
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1976 Jan; 8(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 1108736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experiments on animals to investigate the suitability of perforating corneal sutures (author's transl)].
    Puder R; Goede H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1975 Sep; 167(3):434-6. PubMed ID: 765607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some considerations on experimental lens implant in the rabbit eye, a SEM-study.
    Figueras MJ; Jongebloed WL; Worst JG
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1986 Jan; 61(3-4):351-8. PubMed ID: 3485039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Transplanted vascular endothelial cells to replace corneal endothelial cells by improved anterior chamber injection].
    Zhu Q; Hu Z; Sun X; Hu M; Liu H; Yang Z
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 50(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 24931154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dynamic recovery of the corneal endothelial layer of the rabbit in mechanical injuries to the anterior chamber].
    Ziangirova GG; Malaeva LV; Ermakov NV; Kasparov AA
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1987; 103(2):52-6. PubMed ID: 3603954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of sutures and dendritic polymer adhesives for corneal laceration repair in an in vivo chicken model.
    Berdahl JP; Johnson CS; Proia AD; Grinstaff MW; Kim T
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Apr; 127(4):442-7. PubMed ID: 19365021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model of epithelial downgrowth: II. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of corneal epithelialization.
    Burris TE; Rowsey JJ; Nordquist RE
    Cornea; 1984; 3(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 6399236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of synthetic glues and 10-0 nylon in rabbit lamellar keratoplasty.
    Cho SY; Kim MS; Oh SJ; Chung SK
    Cornea; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1265-8. PubMed ID: 23860428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.