These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 421016)
1. Smear campaign. Way S Br Med J; 1979 Jan; 1(6157):196. PubMed ID: 421016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear? Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The fallacy of the screening interval for cervical smears. Boyce JG; Fruchter RG; Romanzi L; Sillman FH; Maiman M Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 2216192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for Pap smear histories. McKenna MT; Speers M; Mallin K; Warnecke R Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 1419128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pap smear histories in a medical clinic: accuracy of patients' self-reports. Fruchter RG; Rones K; Roth T; Webber CA; Camilien L; Boyce JG N Y State J Med; 1992 Oct; 92(10):421-4. PubMed ID: 1436809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance of documenting clinical appearance of the uterine cervix in the cervical cytology form. Al-Kadri HM; Hajeer AH; Al-Hawashim NS; Salem HH Saudi Med J; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1698-702. PubMed ID: 17106544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records. Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dispute over Pap smear specimen slides resolved by Connecticut Supreme Court. Cornelio v. Stamford Hospital. Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Jun; 16(8):5-8. PubMed ID: 10537690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A cervical cytology campaign using a computerised age-sex register. Dixon PN; Morris AF J R Coll Gen Pract; 1974 Jun; 24(143):418-24. PubMed ID: 4436844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-menopausal smear patterns--a review of vaginal smears in 480 women. Pillay B; Yap SK; Lim GL Med J Malaysia; 1992 Mar; 47(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 1387448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A smear campaign. Gurr M N Z Nurs J; 1987 Aug; 80(8):13. PubMed ID: 3696602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer processing of medical narrative data: application to vaginal cytology. Chef RC; Tibaux GJ; Pelzer AM Acta Cytol; 1969 Jun; 13(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 5257064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Screening Tools for Pap Smears in General Practice. Harding C; Seal A; Pilotto L; Mackey K; Duncan G; Huynh R; McWilliam R; Blake S J Innov Health Inform; 2016 Sep; 23(3):835. PubMed ID: 28059690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing claims data and self-reported data with the medical record for Pap smear rates. Fowles JB; Fowler E; Craft C; McCoy CE Eval Health Prof; 1997 Sep; 20(3):324-42. PubMed ID: 10183327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytologic smear campaign against cancer. WAHI PN J Indian Med Assoc; 1962 Jun; 38():662-3. PubMed ID: 14004396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A continuing smear campaign. Gun M N Z Nurs J; 1991 Feb; 84(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 1997913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982. Lynge E; Poll P IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The smear campaign against Pap tests. Vidovich M Aust Nurs J; 1994 Jun; 1(11):34-5. PubMed ID: 8081488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]