These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4211747)

  • 1. [6-month clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations].
    Katsatos I; Poulia-Prompona S; Kostes I
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1974; 28(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 4211747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: three-year report.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Dec; 30(6):891-7. PubMed ID: 4519428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bellfirm P for dental amalgam (2). Clinical application of Bellfirm P for posterior restorations].
    Kawahara H; Nakamura M; Ikeda H; Kawata Y; Hikari S; Maeda T; Sakaguchi K; Iseki T; Yokoyama A
    Shikai Tenbo; 1983 Mar; 61(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 6573791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of differences in amalgam restorations on examination standardization.
    Cobb DS
    J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):938-40. PubMed ID: 9457136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations: two-year report.
    Phillips RW; Avery DR; Mehra R; Swartz ML; McCune RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Aug; 28(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 4504300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam, and silicate restorations.
    Eames WB; Strain JD; Weitman RT; Williams AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Nov; 89(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 4529964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the marginal sealing capacity of composite and conventional materials for filling of tissue defects; in vitro studies].
    Wasik A; Bobowicz Z
    Protet Stomatol; 1977; 27(2):175. PubMed ID: 270176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Amalgam and composite resin in the filling of a Class II preparation: theoretical and preactical evaluation].
    Castagnola L; Toffenetti F
    Odontoiatr Prat; 1977; 12(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 272595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration].
    Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Silicate, Sevriton and composite resins in class IV restorations. Clinical evaluation].
    Mannerberg F; Forss T
    Tandlakartidningen; 1976 Sep; 68(18):1000-14. PubMed ID: 802337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
    Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.