These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 421432)

  • 1. On the use of distribution-functions to describe and classify chromosome density-profiles.
    van den Berg HT; Habbema JD; de France HF; Bakker HK; de Vries GA
    Comput Biol Med; 1979; 9(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 421432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted karyotyping system of banded chromosomes.
    Bruschi C; Tedeschi F; Puglisi PP; Marmiroli N
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1981; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7460628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Light and scanning electron microscopy of the same human metaphase chromosomes.
    Harrison CJ; Jack EM; Allen TD; Harris R
    J Cell Sci; 1985 Aug; 77():143-53. PubMed ID: 4086512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between G band number and chromosome length from prophase to metaphase.
    Jagielski J; Haus O
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1983; 34(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6637533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chromosome preparation and high resolution banding (review).
    Rønne M
    In Vivo; 1990; 4(6):337-65. PubMed ID: 2103374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic karyotype analysis.
    Graham J; Piper J
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metaphase and chromomere banding are distinct entities of chromosome substructure.
    Haapala O
    Hereditas; 1984; 100(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 6725008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic analysis of chromosomes. The use of reduced numerical patterns for computer karyotyping of chromosomes.
    Jagielski J; Noga L; Haus O
    Acta Med Pol; 1982; 23(3-4):183-91. PubMed ID: 7187607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Video techniques applied to chromosome analysis.
    Vrolijk J; ten Brinke H; Ploem JS; Pearson PL
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1980; Suppl 4():108-15. PubMed ID: 6931275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chromosome banding analysis by slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Bartholdi MF; Meyne J; Johnston RG; Cram LS
    Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 2496955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Band features as classification measures for G-banded chromosome analysis.
    Johnston DA; Tang KS; Zimmerman S
    Comput Biol Med; 1993 Mar; 23(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 8513663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Karyotyping of barley chromosomes by a new fluorescence banding technique combined with scanning probe microscopy.
    Sugiyama S; Yoshino T; Hirose T; Ohtani T
    Scanning; 2012; 34(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22058025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prometaphase banding of human chromosomes with basic fuchsin.
    Scheres JM; Merkx GF; Hustinx TW
    Hum Genet; 1982; 61(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 7129436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual classification of banded human chromosomes ii. classification and karyotyping of integrated density profiles.
    Lundsteen C; Granum E
    Ann Hum Genet; 1977 May; 40(4):431-42. PubMed ID: 879712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Studies of differentially stained metaphase chromosomes using scanning systems and computer technics].
    Saralidze EG; Ul'ianov NB; Kaminir LB
    Tsitologiia; 1983 Mar; 25(3):235-49. PubMed ID: 6344370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elusive chromosome anomalies.
    Francke U
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1986 May; 21(5):175-8, 182, 191-3. PubMed ID: 3084511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.