These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4215331)

  • 1. Computer generated isodose curves for high energy x-ray machines. Experimental verification and time-saving strategies.
    Lane K; Bloch P; Davis LW
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1974 Aug; 121(4):865-72. PubMed ID: 4215331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer generated scatter dose distributions for 6-MV radiotherapy photon beams.
    Bloch P; Wallace R
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 460065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of beam spoiler on radiation dose for head and neck irradiation with 10-MV photon beam.
    Niroomand-Rad A; Javedan K; Rodgers JE; Harter KW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(4):935-40. PubMed ID: 9128972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Final Aperture Superposition Technique applied to fast calculation of electron output factors and depth dose curves.
    Faddegon BA; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3286-94. PubMed ID: 16370417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer generation of high-energy x-ray dose distributions.
    Schulz RJ; McKiernan F; Agostinelli AG
    Med Phys; 1976; 3(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 815776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer algorithm for electron beam treatment planning.
    Khan FM; Lee JM
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 111018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose distributions of x-ray fields as shaped with multileaf collimators.
    Zhu Y; Boyer AL; Desobry GE
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Jan; 37(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 1741421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer generation of cobalt-60 single beam dose distribution using an analytical beam model.
    Jayaraman S
    Strahlentherapie; 1981 Mar; 157(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 7210055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum field size and choice of isodose lines in electron beam treatment.
    Das IJ; Cheng CW; Healey GA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 7995747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time 3D dose calculation and display: a tool for plan optimization.
    Matthews JW; Rosenberger FU; Bosch WR; Harms WB; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Aug; 36(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 8823271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer calculations of dose for irregularly shaped fields for cobalt-60 and 6 MV photons.
    Bukovitz AG
    Radiology; 1974 Oct; 113(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 4214498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calculation of dose in off-central axis planes using off-axis ratios.
    Prasad SC; Bassano DA; Ames TE
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 6727796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience in implementing the Mark III Rad 8 system for radiotherapy dose computations.
    Wilkinson JM; Redmond WJ
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Sep; 48(573):732-8. PubMed ID: 1182432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relevance of radiation penumbra in high-energy photon beam therapy.
    Sasane JB; Iyer PS
    Strahlentherapie; 1981 Oct; 157(10):658-61. PubMed ID: 6795764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical characterization of 45-MV photon beams for use in treatment planning.
    Suntharalingam N; Steben JD
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 403399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of measured relative isodose distributions in tangential stationary fields of Co-60 radiation with calculated isodose plans (author's transl)].
    Schrader R; Würthner K
    Strahlentherapie; 1979 Feb; 155(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 425130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling skin collimation using the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm.
    Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Antolak JA; Boyd RA
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3409-18. PubMed ID: 16370427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diamond detector versus silicon diode and ion chamber in photon beams of different energy and field size.
    Bucciolini M; Buonamici FB; Mazzocchi S; De Angelis C; Onori S; Cirrone GA
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2149-54. PubMed ID: 12945980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose calculations for arbitrarily shaped electron beams.
    Bruinvis IA; van Amstel A; Elevelt AJ; van der Laarse R
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 364():73-9. PubMed ID: 6316744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.