These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 421982)
1. Part two: Implementing a shared quality assurance program. Lindstrom R Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Mar; 56(3):32-4. PubMed ID: 421982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Designing a shared radiology quality assurance program. Lindstrom R Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Jan; 56(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 761723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. R. T. or not R. T.? that is the question. Lindstrom R Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Jul; 58(7):22. PubMed ID: 7286468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assurance programs for diagnostic radiology facilities: Food and Drug Administration. Final recommendation. Fed Regist; 1979 Dec; 44(239):71728-40. PubMed ID: 10244502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of government regulation on radiology. Rossi RP Radiol Manage; 1980; 2(2):22-30. PubMed ID: 10245600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The technologist and the patient building a more caring relationship. Cunningham JJ Adm Radiol; 1988 Jul; 7(7):53-6. PubMed ID: 10288809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality and safety are more important than price when buying radiologic equipment]. Tidebrant G; Lukes P; Wihed A Lakartidningen; 1992 Feb; 89(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 1740947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiologic quality control and servicing. Health Devices; 1992; 21(6-7):188-230. PubMed ID: 1639624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Setting up a quality-assurance program: issues with impact on patient care. Virapongse C; Clore F; Walker R Appl Radiol; 1987 Feb; 16(2):26-8, 32-3, 66. PubMed ID: 10289743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A system of work safety standards. X-ray diagnostic offices. Safety requirements (OST 42-21-15--83)]. Kochetova GP; Chikirdin EG Med Tekh; 1984; (3):40-1. PubMed ID: 6748901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. CT quality assurance in the mid 1980s. Part 2. Burkhart RL; McCrohan JL; Shuman FG Appl Radiol; 1987 Jul; 16(7):27-8, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10287001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department. Glaser SM; Dehn TG QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance evaluation of radiologic technologists: a method for improving the communicative process. Kettlehake JE; Malott JC Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10288781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Refining a study design to assess delays in reporting radiologic test results. Gerstein J QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Dec; 6(12):16-20. PubMed ID: 6780959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What are the JCAH's guidelines for reviewing the quality and appropriateness of care provided by support services, such as the radiology department? Affeldt JE J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):49. PubMed ID: 10309865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]