61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4220480)
1. Carcinoma of the cervix in Indian women.
Sheehan JF; Basque GJ; Barrett HV
Nebr State Med J; 1965 Nov; 50(11):553-8. PubMed ID: 4220480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A 10-year survey of cervical carcinoma in Indians of the Southwest.
Bivens MD; Fleetwood HO
Obstet Gynecol; 1968 Jul; 32(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 5743010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer screening in Canadian Native women. Adequacy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Hislop TG; Band PR; Deschamps M; Clarke HF; Smith JM; Ng VT
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8291352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pap smear screening among urban Southwestern American Indian women.
Risendal B; DeZapien J; Fowler B; Papenfuss M; Giuliano A
Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):510-8. PubMed ID: 10600432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cervix uteri cancer control program].
Jordan SW
Bol Oficina Sanit Panam; 1969 Sep; 67(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 4247529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Carcinoma of the cervix in Southwestern American Indian women.
Jordan SW; Sopher RL; Key CR; Brylinski D; Huang J
Cancer; 1972 May; 29(5):1235-41. PubMed ID: 5021616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcinoma of the cervix in a country district.
Tennent RB; Tennent MS; Philip NA
N Z Med J; 1967 Mar; 66(415):Suppl:7-13. PubMed ID: 5228790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri.
Selim MA; So-Bosita JL; Neuman MR
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1974 Nov; 139(5):697-700. PubMed ID: 4428326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a statistical survey in a 350-bed general hospital.
Sherman RH; Hardy JC
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1968 Aug; 67(12):1382-93. PubMed ID: 5188225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Epidemiological aspects of detection of carcinoma of the cervix in the region of Ljubljana].
Kovacic J; Bonta S
Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan; 23(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5553174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer screening and the older woman: obstacles and opportunities.
Brooks SE
Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8826140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cytological diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix. Results during 1971].
Gerber E; Vajda D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1972 Oct; 92(10):813-28. PubMed ID: 4660894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Significance of systematic examinations of working women in the detection of uterine cervix cancer].
Mekuli S; Krajinović S; Udicki S; Bosković M; Nastasović M; Ducić S; Maric R; Obradović M; Sokić S; Radovanović Z
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1969 Jun; 97(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 5198723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Carcinoma of the cervix in Southwestern American indians: results of a cytologic detection program.
Jordan SW; Key CR
Cancer; 1981 May; 47(10):2523-32. PubMed ID: 7272903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A critical evaluation of the vaginal irrigation kit as a screening method for the detection of cancer of the cervix.
Anderson WA; Gunn SA
Acta Cytol; 1966; 10(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 5227363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. American Indian women's talking circle. A cervical cancer screening and prevention project.
Hodge FS; Fredericks L; Rodriguez B
Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(7 Suppl):1592-7. PubMed ID: 8839577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A program of control of cervico-uterine cancer].
Jordan S
Salud Publica Mex; 1968; 10(5):651-5. PubMed ID: 5700053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Frequency and follow-up of non-negative cervical smears in the counties of Storstrøm, Vestsjaelland and Bornholm in 1979-1989].
Lynge E; Poll P; Larsen J; Schultz HB; Thommesen N
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Jan; 155(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 8430472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer mortality among American Indians, 1950-67.
Creagan ET; Fraumeni JF
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1972 Oct; 49(4):959-67. PubMed ID: 5084128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Morphology and development of 106 cervical atypias observed during 12,300 pregnancies].
de Brux J; Panopoulos C; Coupez F
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1971; 66(11):671-9. PubMed ID: 5148541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
