These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 422388)
41. Experimental determination of the dose deposition profile of a 90Sr beta source. Gaza R; Bulur E; McKeever SW; Soares CG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):33-7. PubMed ID: 16644945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. TLD personal monitoring of external gamma-ray exposure in uranium mines using CaSO4:Dy in Teflon discs. Boas JF; Murray A; Young JG Health Phys; 1982 Jun; 42(6):865-8. PubMed ID: 7107296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Optimum parameters of TLD100 powder used for radiotherapy beams calibration check. Arib M; Yaich A; Messadi A; Dari F Med Dosim; 2006; 31(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 16905448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Determination of quality parameters from statistical analysis of routine TLD dosimetry data. German U; Weinstein M; Pelled O Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):306-9. PubMed ID: 16709715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Performance of Harshaw TLD-100H two-element Dosemeter. Luo LZ; Rotunda JE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):324-30. PubMed ID: 16644944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. On the reassessment of thermal neutron doses in TLD-100 by measuring the residual dose. Abraham A; Weinstein M; German U; Alfassi ZB Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):524-7. PubMed ID: 17507383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Technical aspects of the Naval Dosimetry Center quality assurance programme. St John TJ; Cassata JR; Blake PK; Wallace WH; Minniti R Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):273-7. PubMed ID: 16757494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The expected useful lifetime of TLD cards. Cox FM; Gorby BC Health Phys; 1980 Apr; 38(4):493-6. PubMed ID: 7410074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Systematical and statistical errors in using reference light sources to calibrate TLD readers. Burgkhardt B; Piesch E Health Phys; 1981 Apr; 40(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 7228706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry. Al-Haj A; Lagarde C; Mahyoub F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):399-402. PubMed ID: 17223633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dosimetric properties of new cards with high-sensitivity MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) detectors for Harshaw automatic reader. Budzanowski M; Bilski P; Olko P; Ryba E; Perle S; Majewski M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):251-3. PubMed ID: 17020912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Type testing the Model 6600 plus automatic TLD reader. Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ; Streetz KL Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):303-6. PubMed ID: 16835278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A robotic manipulator for handling TLD badges. Levinson S; Weinstein M; Abraham A; German U; Gorelik V; Rozenfeld R; Hillel S; Rodnay G Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5 Suppl):S190-3. PubMed ID: 18849713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The implementation in routine of the ENEA new personal photon dosemeter. Fantuzzi E; Mariotti F; Morelli B; Uleri G Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16644988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]