These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 422427)

  • 1. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 422427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 511665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
    Beattie RC; Zentil A; Svihovec DA
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The controversial relationship between loudness discomfort levels and acoustic reflex thresholds.
    Ritter R; Johnson RM; Northern JL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):123-31. PubMed ID: 422423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 19194294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comfortable speech listening levels: effects of competition and instruction.
    Beattie RC
    Am J Otol; 1982 Jan; 3(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 7055233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Most comfortable loudness shift as a measure of speech attenuation by hearing protectors.
    Letowski T; Burstein N; Clark J; Romanowski L; Sevec A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Apr; 56(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 7726101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
    Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Carmen RE; Kunkel HA
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 7409356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.
    Villchur E; Killion MC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18769270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comfortable loudness levels for speech: effects of signal-to-noise ratios and instructions.
    Beattie RC; Himes BE
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 6545540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach.
    Mariam M; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships among speech threshold, loudness discomfort, comfortable loudness, and PB max in the elderly hearing impaired.
    Beattie RC; Warren VG
    Am J Otol; 1982 Apr; 3(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7081412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.