These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 422427)
21. Relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and acoustic reflex threshold as a function of hearing loss. Charuhas PA; Chung DY; Barry S J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 756864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The stability of and the relation between the acoustic reflex and uncomfortable loudness levels. Forquer BD J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 511663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Output capabilities of personal music players and assessment of preferred listening levels of test subjects: outlining recommendations for preventing music-induced hearing loss. Breinbauer HA; Anabalón JL; Gutierrez D; Cárcamo R; Olivares C; Caro J Laryngoscope; 2012 Nov; 122(11):2549-56. PubMed ID: 23060148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech. Hochberg I Audiology; 1975; 14(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1147843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Psychometric functions for loudness discomfort and most comfortable loudness levels. Dirks DD; Kamm C J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Dec; 19(4):613-27. PubMed ID: 1003944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relative loudness perception of low and high frequency sounds in the open and occluded ear. Keidser G; Katsch R; Dillon H; Grant F J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3351-7. PubMed ID: 10875380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Calibration of ipsilateral acoustic reflex stimuli. A comparison of loudness balance and equal reflex response methods. Leis BR; Lutman ME Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 515694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired individuals. McLeod HL; Greenberg HJ J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Dec; 22(4):873-83. PubMed ID: 513694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differences and intersubject variability of loudness discomfort levels measured in sound pressure level and hearing level for TDH-50P and ER-3A earphones. Valente M; Potts LG; Valente M J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 9046070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship between intensity and reaction time in normal-hearing infants and adults. Leibold LJ; Werner LA Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11951853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. Kamm C; Dirks DD; Mickey MR J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):668-81. PubMed ID: 745368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones and speech in the presence of masking noise. Richards AM J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 1186159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Auditory fMRI of Sound Intensity and Loudness for Unilateral Stimulation. Behler O; Uppenkamp S Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():165-174. PubMed ID: 27080657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison between the electrically reproduced loudness and the original loudness of speech at high levels. Tschopp K; Beckenbauer T Br J Audiol; 1991 Aug; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 1756318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]