These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves. Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. Baumgartner H; Khan S; DeRobertis M; Czer L; Maurer G J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 1531058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-dimensional color-mapping of turbulent shear stress distribution downstream of two aortic bioprosthetic valves in vitro. Nygaard H; Giersiepen M; Hasenkam JM; Reul H; Paulsen PK; Rovsing PE; Westphal D J Biomech; 1992 Apr; 25(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 1583021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics by Doppler: lessons from in vitro studies of the St. Jude valve. Khan SS J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Mar; 2(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 8261156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pulsatile flow study comparing the Hancock porcine xenograft aortic valve prostheses models 242 and 250. Wright JT Med Instrum; 1977; 11(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 859469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative performance of prosthetic heart valves based on power measurements. Swanson WM Med Instrum; 1984; 18(6):318-25. PubMed ID: 6521677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydrogen bubble visualization of the flow past aortic prosthetic valves. Lichtenstein O; Martínez-Val R; Méndez J; Castillo-Olivares JL Life Support Syst; 1986; 4(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 2943946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method for measuring the mean pressure gradient across prosthetic heart valves under in vitro pulsatile flow conditions. Wright JT; Brown MC Med Instrum; 1977; 11(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 870808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the hemodynamics of several prosthetic heart valves: in vitro study. Modi VJ; Akutsu T Monogr Atheroscler; 1990; 15():125-37. PubMed ID: 2296238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Velocity profiles in the wake of two prosthetic heart valves using a new cardiovascular simulator. Farahifar D; Cassot F; Bodard H; Pelissier R J Biomech; 1985; 18(10):789-802. PubMed ID: 2933410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro heart valve testing: steady versus pulsatile flow. Black MM; Hose DR; Lamb CJ; Lawford PV; Ralph SJ J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Mar; 3(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 8012641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valve function. Findings in normal valves. Iwasaka T; Naggar CZ; Sugiura T; Tarumi N; Takayama Y; Inada M Chest; 1991 Feb; 99(2):399-403. PubMed ID: 1989802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulsatile flow past St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve. An in vitro study. Chandran KB J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 May; 89(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 3990323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An instrument for the measurement of in vitro velocity and turbulent shear stress in the immediate vicinity of prosthetic heart valves. Woo YR; Yoganathan AP Life Support Syst; 1986; 4(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 2937981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]