These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 422809)

  • 1. Exploratory laboratory studies of the relative aversiveness of traffic sounds.
    Cermak GW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Jan; 65(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 422809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Penalty for impulse noise, derived from annoyance ratings for impulse and road-traffic sounds.
    Vos J; Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 3973214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the level-dependent penalty for impulse sound.
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):883-93. PubMed ID: 2212313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise.
    Coensel BD; Vanwetswinkel S; Botteldooren D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):EL148-53. PubMed ID: 21476622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise-induced annoyance from transportation noise: short-term responses to a single noise source in a laboratory.
    Kim J; Lim C; Hong J; Lee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):804-14. PubMed ID: 20136203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The effect of noise on sleep--changes in hypnograms of subjects exposed to repeated truck-passing sound].
    Kawada T; Naganuma S; Kiryu Y; Suzuki S
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 47(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 1447835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental and personal monitoring of exposure to urban noise and community response.
    Orlando P; Perdelli F; Cristina ML; Piromalli W
    Eur J Epidemiol; 1994 Oct; 10(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 7859853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustical characteristics of water sounds for soundscape enhancement in urban open spaces.
    Jeon JY; Lee PJ; You J; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2101-9. PubMed ID: 22423706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of land-use regression models to estimate sound pressure levels and frequency components of road traffic noise in Taichung, Taiwan.
    Chang TY; Liang CH; Wu CF; Chang LT
    Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():104959. PubMed ID: 31284109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New aspects of the traffic noise problem in the inner city area].
    Baumbach W; Mörstedt R; Schulze B; Wölke G; Ullmann R; Grossmann G
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1990 Apr; 36(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 2360352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model.
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3330-45. PubMed ID: 1619113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Changes in the hypnograms of subjects exposed to repeated truck-passing sounds of 45, 50 and 55 dB (A)].
    Kawada T; Kiryu Y; Aoki S; Suzuki S
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 1993 Dec; 48(5):932-8. PubMed ID: 8107296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Annoyance due to single and combined sound exposure from railway and road traffic.
    Ohrström E; Barregård L; Andersson E; Skånberg A; Svensson H; Angerheim P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2642-52. PubMed ID: 18189556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial traffic noise pollution assessment - A case study.
    Monazzam MR; Karimi E; Abbaspour M; Nassiri P; Taghavi L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2015; 28(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 26190737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in subjective loudness and annoyance depending on the road traffic noise spectrum.
    Torija AJ; Flindell IH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24437739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensions of vehicle sounds perception.
    Wagner V; Kallus KW; Foehl U
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Oct; 64():41-46. PubMed ID: 28610812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise abatement and traffic safety: The trade-off of quieter engines and pavements on vehicle detection.
    Mendonça C; Freitas E; Ferreira JP; Raimundo ID; Santos JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():11-7. PubMed ID: 23182778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Traffic noise and hypertension: an epidemiological study on the role of subjective reactions.
    Neus H; Rüddel H; Schulte W
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1983; 51(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 6852929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.