These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Auditory thresholds in children for narrow-band noise and warble tones in sound field. McDermott JC; Hodgson WR Br J Audiol; 1982 Nov; 16(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7159794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry. Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sound attenuation of TDH-39 earphones in a diffuse field of narrow-band noise. Arlinger SD J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jan; 79(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 3944342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses. Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The selection of modulation rates for frequency modulated sound field stimuli. Walker G; Dillon H Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 6648312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone. Cox RM; McDaniel DM J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability. Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audiometric Thresholds: Stimulus Considerations in Sound Field and Under Earphones. Norrix LW; Anderson A Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26650376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants. Parry G; Hacking C; Bamford J; Day J Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 14582637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sound field audiometry: recommended stimuli and procedures. Walker G; Dillon H; Byrne D Ear Hear; 1984; 5(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 6706021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry. Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5. Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency-modulated tones. Kay RH; Matthews DR J Physiol; 1972 Sep; 225(3):657-77. PubMed ID: 5076392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-frequency audiometry using precision earphones: reliability under laboratory and field conditions. Ising H; Babisch W; Dziombowski D; von Arentsschild O; Fischer R Audiology; 1986; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3954679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Visual reinforcement audiometry with different sound stimuli in children]. Vieira EP; Azevedo MF Pro Fono; 2007; 19(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 17710345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Monaural and binaural equal-loudness matches for tones of different frequency by automatic audiometry]. Karjalainen S Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 325():1-43. PubMed ID: 4534028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. Garstecki DC; Bode DL J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]