BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4236042)

  • 1. [Cochlear microphonic responses provoked by different types of transitory signals].
    Legouix JP
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1968 Jul; 162(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 4236042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cochlear microphonic responses to mechanical impulses applied directly to the basilar membrane].
    Legouix JP
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1966; 160(10):1782-4. PubMed ID: 4227976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postactivation potentiation of guinea pig cochlear microphonic potentials.
    Veselý C; Faltýnek L
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove; 1971; 14(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 5289894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the limitations of cochlear-microphonic measurements.
    Dallos P; Schoeny ZG; Cheatham MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Apr; 49(4):Suppl 2:1144+. PubMed ID: 5552192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation.
    Suesserman MF; Spelman FA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8335327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proceedings: 359. Effect of sciatic nerve stimulation upon cochlear microphonic potential in guinea pigs.
    Iwama M
    Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi; 1973; 35(8):533. PubMed ID: 4799751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
    Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between human and animal cochlear potentials.
    Kupperman R
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:739-51. PubMed ID: 5148988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proceedings: 360. Phasor superposition effect involved in measurement of cochlear microphonic potential change.
    Uchiyama H; Negishi T
    Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi; 1973; 35(8):533-4. PubMed ID: 4799752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amplitude distributions of cochlear microphonic response to an acoustic sinusoid in noise.
    Teas DC; Henry GB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Mar; 11(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 5648541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Observations on cochlear potentials following intensive sound stimuli].
    Aran JM
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1966; 87(9):780-4. PubMed ID: 5976753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Method of recording cochlear microphonic potentials in the cat].
    Holicska D; Kis Z
    Otorinolaringologie; 1972; 17(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 5020042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Work experience in recording cochlear potentials with the use of glass microelectrodes].
    Prazhma I
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1969; 31(4):71-6. PubMed ID: 5377965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effects of furosemide and ethacrynic acid upon the cochlear function in the guinea pig.
    Syka J; Melichar I
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 14 Suppl():63-9. PubMed ID: 6949286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New technic for derivation of cochlear potentials of animals].
    Tereshchuk TI; Pudov AI
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 May; 67(5):772-5. PubMed ID: 7286313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of the acute effects of I.V. furosemide and bumetanide on the cochlear action potential (N1) and on the A.C. cochlear potential (CM) at 6 KHz in cats, dogs and guinea pigs.
    Brown RD
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 14 Suppl():71-83. PubMed ID: 6949287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Isolation of cochlear inner hair cells from guinea pigs by trypsin].
    Tang Y; Yuan S; Liu S
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2003 Jul; 34(3):582-3. PubMed ID: 12910729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Travel time in the cochlea and its determination from cochlear-microphonic data.
    Dallos P; Cheatham MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Apr; 49(4):Suppl 2:1140+. PubMed ID: 5552191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DISTORTION PROCESSES IN THE COCHLEAR-MICROPHONIC RESPONSE UNDER NORMAL AND ABNORMAL PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS.
    WOLSK D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1965 Apr; 37():647-52. PubMed ID: 14288279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear mechanics, nonlinearities, and cochlear potentials.
    Dallos P; Cheatham MA; Ferraro J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Mar; 55(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 4819860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.