66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 424557)
1. Dosimetric evaluation of a computed tomography treatment system.
Prasad SC; Glasgow GP; Purdy JA
Radiology; 1979 Mar; 130(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 424557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study.
Moore WH; Bonvento M; Olivieri-Fitt R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W498-502. PubMed ID: 17056880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation exposure of patients who undergo CT of the trunk.
Mini RL; Vock P; Mury R; Schneeberger PP
Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 7724783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners.
Brasch RC; Boyd DP; Gooding CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jul; 131(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 97992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures.
Nawfel RD; Judy PF; Silverman SG; Hooton S; Tuncali K; Adams DF
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):180-4. PubMed ID: 10887246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial distribution of dose in computed tomography with special reference to thin-slice techniques.
Moström U; Ytterbergh C
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 2962618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A film dosimetry system for use in computed tomography.
Dixon RL; Ekstrand KE
Radiology; 1978 Apr; 127(1):255-8. PubMed ID: 635194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The deviation of liver dose in real patients for thoracic computed tomography scans: a new approach to individual dosimetry with methods of radiotherapy treatment planning.
von Boetticher H; Lüllau T; Lammers M; Kamau EN; Poppe B
Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 21617394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phantom and cadaver measurements of dose and dose distribution in micro-CT of the chest in mice.
Rodt T; Luepke M; Boehm C; von Falck C; Stamm G; Borlak J; Seifert H; Galanski M
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21498330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone marrow dose in chest radiography: the posteroanterior vs. anteroposterior projection.
Archer BR; Whitmore RC; North LB; Bushong SC
Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 472293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Determination of the integral doses in conventional x-ray studies and computed tomography of the skull].
Plattfaut G; Ewen K
Rofo; 1987 Apr; 146(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 3033772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT stereotactic body radiation therapy: Dosimetric evaluation for a real-time SBRT treatment planning and delivery program.
Dunlap N; McIntosh A; Sheng K; Yang W; Turner B; Shoushtari A; Sheehan J; Jones DR; Lu W; Ruchala K; Olivera G; Parnell D; Larner JL; Benedict SH; Read PW
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 21055611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT.
Paul NS; Blobel J; Prezelj E; Burey P; Ursani A; Menezes RJ; Kashani H; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1363-80. PubMed ID: 20145292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical dosimetric properties of the TLD-300 thermoluminescent dosimetry detector and its use for measuring spatial dose distribution in patient radiation planning].
Olthoff-Münter K; Baumhoer W
Strahlentherapie; 1985 Feb; 161(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 3975947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetry and adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study.
Fahey FH; Palmer MR; Strauss KJ; Zimmerman RE; Badawi RD; Treves ST
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 17293575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations.
Fearon T; Vucich J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jan; 148(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 3491508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
