These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4246249)
1. Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures. Postlethwait RW Ann Surg; 1970 Jun; 171(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 4246249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Considerations in the choice of suture material for various tissues. Van Winkle W; Hastings JC Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1972 Jul; 135(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 4260690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of tendon suture materials in dogs. Srugi S; Adamson JE Plast Reconstr Surg; 1972 Jul; 50(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 5032323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Synthetic absorbable surgical suture material (PGA). An experimental study. Bergman FO; Borgström SJ; Holmlund DE Acta Chir Scand; 1971; 137(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 4260393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of indigenous knitted nylon mesh to repair large abdominal defects--an experimental study. Parulkar BG; Mathur SK; Supe AN; Samsi AB; Vora IM J Postgrad Med; 1986 Oct; 32(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 2953889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical suture-canine tissue interaction for six common suture types. Homsy CA; McDonald KE; Akers WW; Short C; Freeman BS J Biomed Mater Res; 1968 Jun; 2(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 4884607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Skin closure in abdominal incisions. Continuous nylon suture versus Steristrip Tapesuture : a controlled trial. Pedersen VM; Jensen BS; Hansen B Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(8):619-22. PubMed ID: 6211884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The relative importance of Vicryl and Prolene sutures to the strength of healing abdominal wounds. Nilsson T Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):503-7. PubMed ID: 6213133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new era of non-absorbable sutures. Miller JM Exp Med Surg; 1970; 28(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 5525356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure. Rodeheaver GT; Nesbit WS; Edlich RF Ann Surg; 1986 Aug; 204(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 3017248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of elongation rate on tensile strength of surgical suture materials. Marchant LH; Knapp S; Apter JT Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1974 Aug; 139(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 4601701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure. Gys T; Hubens A Acta Chir Belg; 1989; 89(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 2530745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of heparin on collagen synthesis and wound healing. Ludewig RM; Thompson R; Rudolf LE; Wangensteen SL Surg Forum; 1970; 21():58-9. PubMed ID: 4255228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical comparison of nylon and polyglactin sutures for abdominal wound closure. Retief PJ S Afr J Surg; 1983 Mar; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 6224302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal wound closure using a new polypropylene monofilament suture. Hermann RE Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1974 Jan; 138(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 4271821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of increased and reduced tension on the mechanical properties of healing wound in the abdominal wall. Nilsson T Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg; 1982; 16(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 6218606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of 10-0 polyglycolic acid and polyglactin suture in rabbit limbal wounds. Sugar A Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 Jan; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 6244525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. WOUND HEALING IN HOMOLOGOUS AND IN SYNTHETIC AORTIC IMPLANTS IN DOGS. CAIN H; BUDDECKE E; CARSTENSEN G J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1963 Dec; 4():783-90. PubMed ID: 14099988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]