These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4246936)

  • 1. [On esophageal voice intelligibility].
    Gaches L; Auclaire E; Tournier S; Vallancien B
    J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac (1967); 1968 Mar; 17(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 4246936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers.
    Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of qualitative voice and speech quality judgments after total laryngectomy].
    Miani C; Bertino G; Bellomo A; Staffieri A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Jun; 18(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 9926447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between esophageal speech proficiency and selected measures of auditory function.
    Martin DE; Hoops HR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Mar; 17(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 4828365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory capabilities of patients implanted with the House single-channel cochlear implant.
    Brimacombe JA; Edgerton BJ; Doyle KJ; Erratt JD; Danhauer JL
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():204-16. PubMed ID: 6596844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Intelligibility of esophageal voice and the problem of vocal rehabilitation].
    Gârbea S; Bodea I
    Otorinolaringologie; 1970; 15(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 5428227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [How good is the esophageal voice?].
    Brusis T; Schöning A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Nov; 63(11):585-8. PubMed ID: 6521588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study of a intelligibility test for esophageal voice].
    Genet ; Gaches L; Vallancien B
    J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac (1967); 1970 Sep; 19(7):579-84. PubMed ID: 4250274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of the intelligibility of the esophageal voice].
    Estienne F; Van den Eeckhaut J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1969; 23(5):564-84. PubMed ID: 5403072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The voice prosthesis. An underutilized procedure in rehabilitation?].
    Seinsch W
    HNO; 1993 Dec; 41(12):595-6. PubMed ID: 8125805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Acoustic study of esophageal voice. Comparison with laryngeal voice].
    Besson R; Grateau P; Péchard L
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1984; 105(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 6505421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity.
    van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF
    Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice onset time characteristics of esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speech of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Wong J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):780-9. PubMed ID: 18978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Studies on the Lombard effect].
    Schlöndorff G; Tegtmeier W; Ilstad B
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1971 Mar; 50(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 5125579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the effect of normal, whispering, and esophageal speech, as well as voice prosthesis, with the sonograph].
    Sáfrán A
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1971; 23(5):323-32. PubMed ID: 5156391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy.
    Boyd JH; Varvares M; Fitzmaurice S
    Mo Med; 1995 Mar; 92(3):145-7. PubMed ID: 7731448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Speech intelligibility after laryngectomy].
    Novák A
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 29(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 7471262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.